ARTICLE
28 November 2025

Butler Snow Trial Team Secures Victory For University Of Mississippi Medical Center

BS
Butler Snow LLP

Contributor

Butler Snow LLP is a full-service law firm with more than 360 attorneys and advisors collaborating across a network of 27 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia. Butler Snow attorneys serve clients across more than 70 areas of law, representing clients from Fortune 500 companies to emerging start-ups
On November 6, 2025, the Circuit Court of Hinds County, Judge Debra H. Gibbs, entered a Final Judgment with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of UMMC in the case of Jessica Moore v. UMMC.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Butler Snow LLP are most popular:
  • within Insurance topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Insurance industries

On November 6, 2025, the Circuit Court of Hinds County, Judge Debra H. Gibbs, entered a Final Judgment with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of UMMC in the case of Jessica Moore v. UMMC. This case was brought by the mother of a minor plaintiff who suffered a catastrophic brain injury in 2016 from a VP shunt infection caused by the streptococcus bacteria. This case involved complex medical issues arising from whether clinicians should have tapped a VP shunt during a 2016 admission and whether the plaintiff's ultimate brain injury was caused by UMMC. The medical issues involved fields of pediatric neurosurgery, neuroradiology, and infectious‑disease.

Butler Snow's trial team of Robbie Greenlee and Beth Roper navigated dueling expert opinions, dense medical records, a sympathetic child plaintiff, and Mississippi's loss‑of‑chance causation doctrine. The Court held Plaintiff failed to prove proximate cause because, when the shunt infection was later diagnosed at a Louisiana hospital, all treatment options remained available, and the later brainstem injury flowed from post‑discharge treatment choices in which UMMC played no role. The Court also resolved numerous evidentiary objections and Rule 702 challenges, underscoring a context‑specific standard‑of‑care analysis and culminating in a complete defense judgment for UMMC.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More