ARTICLE
8 June 2023

Oklahoma Supreme Court Rules Two State Anti-Abortion Laws Unconstitutional

SG
Shipman & Goodwin LLP

Contributor

Shipman & Goodwin LLP  logo
Shipman & Goodwin’s value lies in our commitment -- to our clients, to the profession and to the community. We have one goal: to help our clients achieve their goals. How we accomplish it is simple: we devote our considerable experience and depth of knowledge to understand each client’s unique needs, business and industry, and then we develop solutions to meet those needs. Clients turn to us when they need a trusted advisor. With our invaluable awareness of each client’s challenges, we can counsel them at every step -- to keep their operations running smoothly, help them navigate complex business transactions, position them for future growth, or resolve business disputes. The success of our clients is of primary importance to us and our attorneys invest meaningful time getting to know the client's business and are skilled in the practice areas and industry sectors critical to that success. With more than 175 attorneys in offices throughout Connecticut, New York and in Washington, DC, we serve the needs of
On May 31, 2023, in a suit brought by a number of abortion providers and advocates, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that two laws restricting the right to abortion...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

On May 31, 2023, in a suit brought by a number of abortion providers and advocates, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that two laws restricting the right to abortion and allowing individual citizens to sue abortion providers were unconstitutional. Abortion providers and advocates were seeking to enjoin Oklahoma S.B. 1503 and H.B. 4327 (passed in the 2022 legislative session).

According to the Court, S.B. 1503 bars an abortion after a heartbeat is detected, except when there is a "medical emergency" — a term the court majority said wasn't even defined.

H.B. 4327 calls for a total abortion ban unless under certain circumstances, like a medical emergency or the pregnancy was the result of a rape that was reported to the police.

The Court had previously ruled in March (paragraph 9,__P.3d__) that the Oklahoma constitution provided a woman an inherent right to terminate a pregnancy when necessary to preserve life, and based upon such earlier ruling, determined that this March ruling applied in the instant case. Thus, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled both laws to be unconstitutional and unenforceable, and there was no further need for an injunction.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More