ARTICLE
30 June 2026

Proposed DHS Rule Could Change How International Students Maintain F-1, J-1 Visa Status

JL
Jackson Lewis P.C.

Contributor

Focused on employment and labor law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.’s 1,100+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients’ goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee.
A proposed Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rule that recently cleared White House review could fundamentally change how international students maintain lawful status in the United States.
United States Immigration
Jackson Lewis P.C. are most popular:
  • within Energy and Natural Resources topic(s)

Takeaways

  • DHS rule cleared by the White House and would replace the long-standing “duration of status” (D/S) framework with fixed admission periods.
  • Extension filings and increased government oversight may create additional administrative burdens and uncertainty for visa holders.
  • The proposal has not been finalized, and the current D/S system remains in effect.

A proposed Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rule that recently cleared White House review could fundamentally change how international students maintain lawful status in the United States. If finalized, the rule (“Establishing a Fixed Time Period of Admission and an Extension of Stay Procedure for Nonimmigrant Academic Students, Exchange Visitors, and Representatives of Foreign Information Media”) would eliminate the long-standing “duration of status” (D/S) framework and replace it with fixed periods of admission.

Under the proposal, most F-1 students and J-1 exchange visitors would be admitted for no more than four years (or the length of their academic program, if shorter). Individuals needing additional time to complete a degree, change academic levels, or pursue post-completion training would be required to file an extension of stay application with USCIS.

Practical implications include:

  • Greater uncertainty for employers that rely on international graduates, particularly in STEM fields, if students encounter delays or complications obtaining status extensions.
  • Additional compliance obligations for educational institutions, as authority over status extensions would shift from schools and to federal immigration authorities.
  • Increased immigration planning needs for students, employers, and universities to avoid potential gaps in lawful status.

DHS has stated that the proposed changes are intended to strengthen oversight, improve tracking of nonimmigrants, reduce overstays, and enhance program integrity. At the same time, universities, employers, and immigration advocates have expressed concerns that mandatory extension filings could increase processing delays, disrupt degree completion — particularly for doctoral and research programs exceeding four years — and make U.S. educational institutions less attractive to international students.

Although the White House Office of Management and Budget has completed its review of the proposed rule, it has not yet been published in the Federal Register and could be revised or challenged before taking effect. Until then, the current duration of status framework remains in place.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More