ARTICLE
31 January 2025

CFPB Takes Action Against Illinois Mortgage Lender For Redlining Violations

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On January 17, 2025, the CFPB filed a complaint against an Illinois-based non-depository mortgage lender for allegedly engaging in discriminatory practices.
United States Illinois Finance and Banking
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

Listen to this post

On January 17, 2025, the CFPB filed a complaint against an Illinois-based non-depository mortgage lender for allegedly engaging in discriminatory practices. The CFPB alleges the lender engaged in improper redlining by deliberately excluding certain neighborhoods from its services based on the racial and ethnic composition of those areas, in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA).

The CFPB claims the lender violated ECOA by engaging in a pattern of discriminatory conduct against applicants on the basis of race or nationality. Specifically, the CFPB alleges the lender:

  • Concentrated office locations and marketing efforts in majority-white neighborhoods. The CFPB alleges the lender intentionally avoided locating offices and marketing its services in majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in the Chicago and Boston metropolitan areas.
  • Discouraged prospective minority applicants. The lender allegedly engaged in practices that discouraged borrowers from applying for mortgage loans to purchase properties in majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods.
  • Failed to maintain sufficient training and compliance monitoring. The lender's employees allegedly received little to no training on fair lender laws and regulations. The lender also allegedly failed to adequately monitor employee conduct for compliance with fair lender laws and did not perform any internal analyses to monitor for redlining.

The CFPB asserts that these actions resulted in a disproportionately low number or mortgage applications and loan originations from majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods.

To address these alleged violations, the CFPB is seeking a court order that would:

  • Ban the lender from engaging in mortgage lending for five years. This would prohibit the lender from engaging in any residential mortgage lending activities or receiving compensation for any such mortgage lending activities.
  • Impose a $1.5 million civil penalty. The penalty would be deposited into the CFPB's victims relief fund to provide financial relief to harmed consumers.

Putting It Into Practice: This action is the latest of a flurry of redlining settlements by federal regulators in advance of the administration change (previously discussed here and here). It remains to be seen how the Trump Administration will approach ECOA enforcement. Lenders should nonetheless ensure their fair lender compliance protocols align with federal regulators' standards and expectations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More