ARTICLE
28 September 2023

Second Circuit Rules That Syndicated Term Loans Are Not Securities

CG
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

Contributor

With a history of legal innovation dating back to the firm’s founding in 1919, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP is trusted by market-leading financial institutions, companies and their boards to manage significant litigation, regulatory matters and transactions. The firm is based in New York with offices in London and Washington, D.C.
On August 24, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in Kirschner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al. that certain syndicated term loans at the center of a transaction involving JP Morgan Chase and other banks were not securities under state law.
United States Finance and Banking

On August 24, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in Kirschner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al. that certain syndicated term loans at the center of a transaction involving JP Morgan Chase and other banks were not securities under state law. While the Second Circuit did not foreclose the possibility that syndicated term loans could be securities under different circumstances,3 for now Kirschner cements the long-standing view — following Banco Espanol de Credito v. Security Pacific National Bank— that syndicated term loans are generally not treated as securities.

CGR Memo - Second Circuit Rules That Syndicated Term Loans Are Not Securities.pdf (pdf | 261.90 KB )

To subscribe to Cahill Publications Click Here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More