ARTICLE
9 September 2025

D.C. Circuit Implements Seven County Principles In Upholding FERC NEPA Analysis

LL
Liskow & Lewis

Contributor

Liskow is a full-service law firm providing regulatory advice, transactional counsel, and handling high-stakes litigation for regional and national companies. Liskow lawyers are strategically located across the gulf coast region and serve clients in the energy, environmental, and maritime sectors, as well as local and regional businesses in virtually all industries.
We've been waiting to see how lower courts will interpret and apply the U.S. Supreme Court's May 2025 decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, CO.
United States Environment

We've been waiting to see how lower courts will interpret and apply the U.S. Supreme Court's May 2025 decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, CO. The D.C. Circuit's August 1 decision in Sierra Club and Public Citizen v. FERC embraces the narrowed scope of review and substantial agency deference articulated by the Supreme Court in upholding FERC's NEPA analysis.

The court "reiterated that judicial review of NEPA compliance must defer to the agency's determination of the scope of its environmental analysis, provided it reasonably addresses the direct effects of the project at hand. This furthered the Seven County principle that NEPA does not serve as a substantive barrier to agency action, but rather ensures informed decision making within the bounds of agency authority."

insideepa.com/...

Originally published on 28 August, 2025

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More