ARTICLE
1 October 2019

The 10th Circuit Grants Re-Leaf To Workers Seeking Overtime Under The FLSA

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
Looks like arguments seeking to dismiss FLSA wage claims under the guise that "cannabis is illegal under federal law" have gone up in smoke.
United States Employment and HR

Looks like arguments seeking to dismiss FLSA wage claims under the guise that "cannabis is illegal under federal law" have gone up in smoke. The 10th circuit created a buzz in Robert Kenney v. Helix TCS, Inc., Case No. 18-1105, by holding that cannabis industry workers can claim overtime under the Federal Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").

The FLSA requires employers to pay employees overtime if employees work more than 40 hours in a workweek.

In Helix, Kenney—a security worker in the cannabis industry—brought an action against his employer claiming that he was misclassified as exempt and sought inter alia overtime wages under the FLSA. Kenney argued that he and other co-workers routinely worked over 40 hours per week but were not compensated for any overtime in violation of the FLSA.

Helix moved to dismiss the action and argued that the FLSA did not apply because the marijuana industry is considered illicit under the Controlled Substances Act ("CSA"). Helix argues that allowing cannabis employees to receive protections under the FLSA would "create a clear repugnancy" between the FLSA and the CSA and "impermissibly render the two laws mutually inconsistent." The district court denied the Motion to Dismiss, and the Appellate Court affirmed.

The Appellate Court retorted that "'case law is clear that employers are not excused from complying with federal laws' because of their other federal violations." The court noted that a finding that pot workers are covered by the FLSA is in line with "both the plain reading and the overall purpose of the statute, and doing so does not require disavowal of the CSA" because congress has amended the CSA many times since the enactment of the CSA "without excluding employees working in the marijuana industry." The court also held that both statutes seek to discourage companies from seeking an unfair advantage over legitimate employers and, thus, cannabis workers "are not categorically excluded from FLSA protections."

Why is this important? Well, cannabis employers governed by the FLSA, will either need to schedule workers so that they do not work more than 40 hours in a workweek or pay workers overtime unless employers want to be subjected to a lawsuit. Moreover, cannabis employers in California, must take other precautions because California's labor laws require employers to compensate employees who work: (1) more than 8 hours in a work day, and (2) more than 40 hours in a workweek.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More