ARTICLE
25 August 2026

There They Go Again! California Launches Another Attack On Arbitration

PR
Proskauer Rose LLP

Contributor

The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. Our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success.
California employers relying on arbitration agreements face new restrictions as Assembly Bill 2155 closes a critical loophole between federal and state arbitration laws. The legislation aligns the California Arbitration Act with Federal Arbitration Act exclusions, fundamentally changing enforcement strategies for workplace disputes. Employers must reassess their arbitration agreements before January 1, 2027, when existing backstop protections disappear.
United States California Employment and HR
Anthony J. Oncidi’s articles from Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular:
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Consumer Industries industries

You might think that California employers who seek nothing more than enforcement of a perfectly reasonable arbitration agreement might finally be able to stop looking over their shoulders, but that is simply not going to happen anytime soon. It seems that with each new legislative session, Sacramento comes up with yet another scheme to limit employers’ right to arbitrate employee disputes.

As experienced practitioners may know, there is some daylight between the two principal arbitration statutes governing workforces in California: the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and the California Arbitration Act (“CAA”). In particular, the FAA exempts contracts involving workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce as well as those alleging sexual harassment or sexual assault.

That loophole will close as of January 1, 2027. On June 30, 2026, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 2155 (“AB 2155”), a short bill that will cast a long shadow in the Golden State. Under the new law, an arbitration agreement will be unenforceable under the CAA to the extent it is unenforceable under the FAA.

In practical terms, this means that employers generally will not be able to turn to the CAA as a backstop when a dispute lies within an FAA exclusion. In AB 2155, the California Legislature specifically identified the two FAA exclusions listed above but also covered potential future exemptions that may be carved out by incorporating “any and all exclusions” under the FAA into California law. California employers don’t need to send their arbitration agreements to the shredder just yet. But they should consider reviewing existing agreements and enforcement strategies before the new year to identify any areas in which existing FAA exclusions may be implicated. Because come January 1, any employer hoping the CAA will provide a second bite at the arbitration apple may find that AB 2155 has taken it off the menu.

There They Go Again! California Launches Another Attack on Arbitration

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More