ARTICLE
19 March 2026

The EEOC Takes Aim At Transgender Bathroom Access

BS
Ballard Spahr LLP

Contributor

Ballard Spahr LLP—an Am Law 100 law firm with more than 750 lawyers in 18 U.S. offices—serves clients across industries in litigation, transactions, and regulatory compliance. A strategic legal partner to clients, Ballard goes beyond to deliver actionable, forward-thinking counsel and advocacy powered by deep industry experience and an understanding of each client’s specific business goals. Our culture is defined by an entrepreneurial spirit, collaborative environment, and top-down focus on service, efficiency, and results.
On February 26, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a decision on bathroom access in federal workplaces, establishing that intimate spaces such as bathrooms...
United States Employment and HR
Brian D. Pedrow’s articles from Ballard Spahr LLP are most popular:
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Metals & Mining industries

On February 26, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a decision on bathroom access in federal workplaces, establishing that intimate spaces such as bathrooms, locker rooms, and sleeping quarters in federal settings are to be designated by sex rather than gender identity. In its decision, the EEOC held that "Title VII permits a federal agency employer to maintain single-sex bathrooms and similar intimate spaces. And it permits a federal agency employer to exclude employees, including trans-identifying employees, from opposite-sex facilities." The EEOC's lone Democrat dissented and accused the Commission of suggesting that "transgender people do not exist."

The EEOC decision signals a departure from its 2015 decision in Lusardi v. Department of the Army, where it found that denying an employee access to a bathroom corresponding to their gender identity could contribute to a hostile work environment. While the ruling shifts away from precedent, the EEOC "stress[ed] the limited reach of [its] quasi-judicial authority." In other words, this decision is not applicable to or binding on private sector employers or the federal courts, so private employers may continue to provide employees access to intimate spaces that correspond with their gender identity. Employers should also note that, according to the US Supreme Court, Title VII continues to protect employees from discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.

Ballard Spahr's Labor and Employment Group frequently advises employers on issues related to employment law and policy. We will continue to monitor the Commission's agenda and the impact of changes to EEOC guidance. Please contact us if we can assist you with these matters.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More