ARTICLE
2 June 2022

New Federal Law Limits Mandatory Arbitration Of Sexual Harassment Or Assault Claims

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
We have previously written on various states' efforts to limit mandatory arbitration agreements in the employment context. Now, employers in all 50 states need to be careful when requiring mandatory arbitration of employment claims.
United States Employment and HR

We have previously written on various states' efforts to limit mandatory arbitration agreements in the employment context. Now, employers in all 50 states need to be careful when requiring mandatory arbitration of employment claims.

On March 3, President Biden signed into law the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (the Act). The Act potentially invalidates pre-dispute arbitration agreements and class waivers regarding sexual assault or sexual harassment claims that arise after March 3, 2022. The Act also states that the determination as to whether the law applies must be made by a court rather than an arbitrator.

Notably, the Act does not per se invalidate arbitration agreements of such claims but rather gives the claimant the option of pursuing claims of sexual harassment or sexual assault in court, as opposed to in arbitration, if they so choose.

It remains to be seen whether this law will be interpreted broadly as potentially barring arbitration of cases that involve claims of sexual harassment or assault that are brought along with other claims.

We recommend the companies currently using arbitration agreements consult with counsel to review those agreements and ensure they do not run afoul of the Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More