ARTICLE
16 October 2026

FTC Secures Auto Dealership Settlement Over Alleged Deceptive Pricing Practices

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
The Federal Trade Commission has secured a settlement with an auto dealership group over allegations of deceptive pricing practices, including advertising vehicles thousands of dollars below actual purchase prices and using misleading prize promotions. The proposed order would require prominent disclosure of total vehicle prices and prohibit misrepresentations concerning pricing, financing, and promotional incentives.
United States Consumer Protection

On October 8, 2026, the FTC announced a proposed settlement with an auto dealership group to resolve allegations that the dealerships advertised vehicle prices thousands of dollars below what consumers actually paid and used misleading prize promotions to attract customers. The FTC filed its complaint and proposed stipulated order in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, alleging deceptive practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

According to the complaint, the dealership group allegedly misrepresented vehicle prices by imposing additional mandatory charges and advertising discounts that were not available to all consumers. Specifically, the FTC alleged that the dealerships:

  • Excluded mandatory fees from advertised prices. The dealerships allegedly charged consumers an average of more than $3,350 above advertised prices in over 92% of transactions through additional administrative, delivery, processing, and other fees.
  • Advertised conditional discounts. Certain advertised prices allegedly included rebates and discounts available only to a subset of consumers, making the advertised prices unavailable to many purchasers.
  • Used misleading prize promotions. The dealerships allegedly sent mailers representing that consumers had won thousands of dollars in cash prizes redeemable at dealerships, although the advertised prizes were not real.
  • Continued misleading advertising after receiving an FTC warning. Following a March 2026 warning letter, the dealerships allegedly added false assurances of pricing transparency to their websites while continuing to advertise vehicles below their actual prices.

Under the proposed order, the dealerships would be required to prominently disclose the total price consumers must pay, excluding only required government charges. The order would also prohibit misrepresentations concerning vehicle pricing, financing requirements, fees, and promotional incentives, and impose ongoing recordkeeping and compliance reporting obligations. The proposed order remains subject to court approval.

Putting It Into Practice:The settlement follows the FTC's March warning to 97 auto dealership groups regarding deceptive vehicle pricing (previously discussed here) and a separate August settlement involving allegedly unauthorized dealership fees (previously discussed here). The FTC's has been using its existing enforcement authority to address vehicle pricing practices following the withdrawal of its CARS Rule. Auto dealers should review advertised prices, mandatory fees, conditional discounts, and promotional materials to ensure consistency with actual transaction terms.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More