ARTICLE
14 October 2026

Car Dealer Chauffeured Into TCPA Wrong Number Case

KM
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Contributor

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP (KMT) maintains an extensive practice, with an international client base, in the rapidly developing fields of Internet, telemarketing and mobile marketing law, sweepstakes and promotions law, gambling, fantasy sports and gaming law, data and consumer privacy law, intellectual property law and general corporate law.
A Massachusetts federal court case examines whether artificial intelligence-generated voice messages constitute prerecorded calls under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, raising novel questions about how AI technology intersects with decades-old telemarketing regulations. The lawsuit stems from a wrong number incident where a car purchase inquiry allegedly used robotic voice technology without proper consent.
United States Consumer Protection

As our readers know, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) legal landscape has rapidly evolved after two significant United States Supreme Court decisions opened the door to previously foreclosed TCPA legal arguments. Changes in the law have not curtailed the filing of TCPA-related lawsuits, however. In a recent TCPA wrong number lawsuit filed in Massachusetts federal court, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant used artificial intelligence (“AI”) to deliver a prerecorded message to his telephone in violation of the TCPA. Below, we discuss the facts alleged in this TCPA wrong number lawsuit, and the importance of hiring experienced TCPA legal counsel.

AI Allegedly Used in TCPA Wrong Number Case

According to the Complaint, Defendant attempted to contact a consumer to inquire about purchasing his car and in doing so, contacted a wrong number and violated the TCPA by delivering a prerecorded message to Plaintiff’s telephone without his consent. Specifically, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant delivered a message that used a “robotic and artificial voice,” as demonstrated by “the unusual tenor, tone, pauses, and cadence.” After receiving this call, Plaintiff asserted that he received a text message from the same caller asking Plaintiff if he was interested in receiving a quote for his car. To allegedly ascertain the identity of the caller, Plaintiff asserted that he called Defendant’s telephone number. After a voice answered, Plaintiff purportedly asked whether the voice was real or not, and the voice responded that it was AI. As a result, Plaintiff, on behalf of himself and a putative class, alleged that Defendant violated the TCPA by placing calls to consumers using a prerecorded message.

The Takeaway? Hire KMT If Faced With a TCPA Wrong Number Claim

Although the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) previously confirmed that the use of AI falls within the TCPA’s restrictions on the use of “artificial or prerecorded voice,” courts are no longer required to defer to regulatory agency guidance and interpretations. With this transformation, companies facing TCPA wrong number and other TCPA-related lawsuits have been able to successfully challenge FCC TCPA rulemakings that have been on the books for decades.

Similar Blog Posts:

Big Telemarketing News! Great Ruling in DNC Text Case

Important DNC List TCPA Ruling

No Individual Claims for Receipt of Text Messages Under TCPA

 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More