ARTICLE
3 November 2021

CFTC Introducing Broker Settles NFA Charges For Records And Registration Violations

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A CFTC-registered introducing broker settled NFA charges for failing to maintain complete records and allowing an unregistered individual to operate as an associated person.
United States Finance and Banking

A CFTC-registered introducing broker settled NFA charges for failing to maintain complete records and allowing an unregistered individual to operate as an associated person ("AP").

As described in the Complaint, NFA found that the firm (i) failed to record its branch office APs' oral communications and SMS text messages and (ii) permanently deleted, in at least eight instances, an AP's chat messages, in violation of NFA Compliance Rule 2-10(a) ("Recordkeeping"). In addition, the firm's CEO was not a registered AP, in violation of NFA Bylaw 301(b) ("Registration of Associates").

NFA stated that that firm's supervisory deficiencies violated NFA Compliance Rule 2-9(a) ("Supervision"), including that the firm:

  • did not wholly capture chat communications for monitoring;
  • reviewed only two percent of its non-flagged messages, when its written procedures specified 20 percent;
  • did not monitor brokers' phones; and
  • did not have procedures in place to monitor its branch offices and did not conduct on-site branch inspections for two years.

To settle the charges, the firm agreed to a (i) $140,000 fine and (ii) various undertakings.

Primary Sources

  1. NFA Press Release: NFA orders London, U.K. introducing broker Freight Investor Services Limited to pay a $140,000 fine
  1. NFA Decision: Freight Investor Services Limited
  1. NFA Complaint: Freight Investor Services Limited

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More