ARTICLE
14 December 2020

Broker-Dealer Settles NYSE Charges For Executing Orders With Multiple Floor Brokers

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A broker-dealer settled NYSE charges for executing orders with more than one floor broker on the account of the same principal.
United States Finance and Banking
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader are most popular:
  • within Intellectual Property, International Law, Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)

A broker-dealer settled NYSE charges for executing orders with more than one floor broker on the account of the same principal.

According to the Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, the broker-dealer had three accounts (a hedge fund, a proprietary trading firm and a proprietary desk) that were all considered to be of the same principal and, thus, under NYSE Rules, should have been sent to a single floor broker. As a result, the broker-dealer violated NYSE Rule 122 ("Orders with More than One Broker").

Additionally, the broker-dealer violated SEA Rule 15c3-5 ("Risk Management Controls for Brokers or Dealers with Market Access") for insufficient supervisory procedures relating to customer credit limits and erroneous order controls, as well as NYSE Rules 342 ("Compliance Supervisors") and 3110(a) and (b) ("Supervision").

To settle charges, the broker-dealer consented to a censure, a $50,000 fine and an undertaking to address the deficiencies identified.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More