ARTICLE
6 June 2023

PAGA Paraphrased – Nickson V. Shemran, Inc., 90 Cal.App.5th 121 (2023)

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
The Fourth District joined the Second District in issuing another published decision holding that plaintiffs do not lose representative standing once their individual PAGA claims are compelled to arbitration.
United States California Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Fourth District joined the Second District in issuing another published decision holding that plaintiffs do not lose representative standing once their individual PAGA claims are compelled to arbitration.

The Court did not provide any guidance on whether the representative claims should be stayed, stating only that, "We leave management of the superior court litigation during the pendency of arbitration to the trial court's sound discretion."

While California's courts of appeal appear set that PAGA Plaintiffs bound to arbitrate their individual claims retain standing to bring a representative PAGA claim in state court, the question of whether the representative claim must be stayed pursuant to C.C.P. § 1281.4 or otherwise remains without direct precedential authority.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More