ARTICLE
29 December 2025

Grant Alerts

D
Dykema

Contributor

You should expect more from your law firm than only excellent legal counsel. Delivering for our clients also means holding ourselves to the highest standards of service, performance, and innovation.

Every client has a different vision for success, so we adapt a custom approach for each of them. We help you identify your goals to craft pragmatic, unique, and efficient solutions that deliver value the way you define it.

For nearly 100 years, we’ve served clients around the world from our strategically situated offices in Michigan, Illinois, Texas, Washington, D.C., California, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Through our practice management structure and our focused Industry Groups, we know and understand the sectors in which our clients compete, from Automotive to Energy, from Gaming to Financial Institutions.

So… how can we deliver success for you today?

In Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock (No. 24-935), the Supreme Court will determine whether workers who locally deliver goods that have travelled in interstate commerce qualify as "transportation workers"...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Dykema are most popular:
  • within Transport and Insurance topic(s)

Notable Business Cases the Court Granted Last Month.

Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock

In Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock (No. 24-935), the Supreme Court will determine whether workers who locally deliver goods that have travelled in interstate commerce qualify as "transportation workers" "engaged in foreign or interstate commerce" under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). The case arises from a wage-and-hour dispute concerning Respondent Angelo Brock's work distributing goods manufactured outside Colorado to retailers within the state. The decision is expected to further define the contours of "interstate commerce" and provide important guidance on when intrastate delivery workers fall within the FAA's exemption.

United States v. Hemani

Following the court of appeals' unusual summary affirmance of the trial court's dismissal of an indictment, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. Hemani (No. 24-1234), a case that could resolve a growing split concerning the disarmament of drug users. The case will test the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), the federal statute that prohibits firearm possession by individuals who are "unlawful user[s] of or addicted to" a controlled substance, as applied to Respondent Ali Danial Hemani. Hemani is the latest in a series of Second Amendment challenges to federal criminal statutes and may further clarify the historical tradition framework governing such claims.

Watson v. Republican National Committee

The Supreme Court will also hear Watson v. Republican National Committee (No. 24-1260), a significant election law case addressing whether federal law preempts state statutes permitting ballots that are timely received by election officials to be counted after election day. A decision in this case has the potential for far-reaching implications on election administration nationwide, particularly as election-law challenges continue to intensify in advance of the 2026 midterm elections.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More