ARTICLE
24 March 2026

HSR Update: Fifth Circuit Action Reinstates Prior HSR Rules And Form

SP
Squire Patton Boggs LLP

Contributor

Squire Patton Boggs is a full service global law firm providing insight at the point where law, business and government meet, giving you a voice, supporting your ambitions and achieving successful outcomes.

With a multidisciplinary team of over 1,500 lawyers in over 40 offices across four continents, we are well-established geographically with strong local and regional positions in North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East and Latin America, and our practice experience spans all key sectors.

On March 19, 2026, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the FTC’s motion for a stay pending appeal in Chamber of Commerce v. FTC...
United States Antitrust/Competition Law
Christopher Gordon’s articles from Squire Patton Boggs LLP are most popular:
  • within Antitrust/Competition Law topic(s)
Squire Patton Boggs LLP are most popular:
  • within Antitrust/Competition Law, Finance and Banking and Immigration topic(s)
  • in Canada

On March 19, 2026, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied the FTC's motion for a stay pending appeal in Chamber of Commerce v. FTC, allowing the district court's decision vacating the FTC's 2024 overhaul of the HSR Notification and Report Form to take immediate effect.

The vacated rule had significantly expanded filing requirements, including new narrative disclosures and broader document production obligations. The district court held that the FTC exceeded its statutory authority in adopting key aspects of the rule. The FTC has appealed, but the prior HSR framework now governs while the appeal proceeds.

The FTC's Premerger Notification Office has announced that it is immediately accepting filings using the pre-February 10, 2025, form and instructions and will make those materials available shortly. The agency will also continue to accept filings under the February 10, 2025, form on a voluntary basis.

Practical Implications

Practical Guidance

For near-term filings, parties should generally consider using the prior form to reduce upfront burden. The new form may still be appropriate where parties wish to provide additional detail upfront to potentially streamline review. Parties should remain mindful of potential "whiplash risk" if the Fifth Circuit later reinstates the new rule.

We will continue to monitor developments and are available to discuss filing strategy for upcoming transactions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More