5 August 2021

DCMS Sub-Committee On Online Harms And Disinformation Launches New Inquiry Into Government's Approach To Tackling Harmful Online Content



Another focus will be on where lessons can be learned from international efforts to regulate big tech, such as in France, Germany and Australia.
UK Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on

The Sub-Committee explains that the Government's draft Online Safety Bill would compel social media sites and search engines to remove harmful content such as terrorist content, child sexual exploitation and abuse and disinformation that causes individual harm.

The Sub-Committee has launched an inquiry to investigate how focus has shifted since the introduction of the Online Safety Strategy Green Paper in 2017, including concerns that the definition of harm is now too narrow and may fail to address issues such as non-state intervention in elections, racist abuse and content that contributes to self-harm and negative body image.

It will also explore key omissions of the draft Bill, such as a general duty for tech companies to deal with reasonably foreseeable harms, a focus on transparency and due process mechanisms or regulatory powers to deal with urgent security threats and how any gaps can be filled before the Bill is finalised. Another focus will be on where lessons can be learned from international efforts to regulate big tech, such as in France, Germany and Australia.

The DCMS Sub-Committee is inviting written submissions addressing the following areas:

  • How has the shifting focus between "online harms" and "online safety" influenced the development of the new regime and draft Bill?
  • Is it necessary to have an explicit definition and process for determining harm to children and adults in the Online Safety Bill, and what should it be?
  • Does the draft Bill focus enough on the ways tech companies could be encouraged to consider safety and/or the risk of harm in platform design and the systems and processes that they put in place?
  • What are the key omissions to the draft Bill, such as a general safety duty or powers to deal with urgent security threats, and (how) could they be practically included without compromising rights such as freedom of expression?
  • Are there any contested inclusions, tensions or contradictions in the draft Bill that need to be more carefully considered before the final Bill is put to Parliament?
  • What are the lessons that the Government should learn when directly comparing the draft Bill to existing and proposed legislation around the world?

The DCMS Sub-Committee stresses that the inquiry is distinct from any work by the Joint Committee on the Draft Online Safety Bill, established by the House of Lords and the House of Commons on 23 July 2021, in which a call for written evidence is expected to be published in due course.

The deadline for submitting evidence is 3 September 2021. To access the call for evidence, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More