ARTICLE
26 May 2016

Disclosure And Transparency Rules: FCA Consultation On Delaying Disclosure Of Inside Information

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
On 20 November 2015, the FCA produced a consultation paper requesting responses to its proposal to amend its guidance about delaying disclosure of inside information in the Disclosure and Transparency Rules ("DTRs").
United Kingdom Corporate/Commercial Law

On 20 November 2015, the FCA produced a consultation paper requesting responses to its proposal to amend its guidance about delaying disclosure of inside information in the Disclosure and Transparency Rules ("DTRs"). The FCA is seeking views on their proposals by 20 February 2016. The FCA notes that it is in the interests of both issuers and investors to have a clear understanding of the basis for classifying information as inside information so that they can properly understand their duties. The FCA states that its aim is to ensure the maintenance of a regime which produces transparency which is useful to investors.

The FCA is proposing to delete the last sentence of DTR 2.5.5.G to clarify that issuers may have a legitimate reason to delay disclosure in circumstances other than the non-exhaustive examples listed in DTR 2.5.3R or the circumstances listed in DTR 2.5.5AR.

The consultation paper also states that:

  • Where an issuer has a commercial or PR-related preference to delay disclosure of inside information but public disclosure would not actually damage its interests, the issuer could not justify a delay by claiming that it would prejudice its legitimate interests; and
  • Delaying disclosure to protect the price of a relevant security does not fall within the meaning of a legitimate interest.

This consultation paper can be found at:

http://www.fca.org.uk/static/documents/cp15-38.pdf

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More