ARTICLE
19 April 2018

Arbitrator - Whether Specialist QC Qualified

S
Shoosmiths

Contributor

Shoosmiths is a law firm clients choose for excellent service, incisive thinking and above all for our ability to focus on what matters.

There is no secret to our growth over recent years. Clients love working with Shoosmiths people because of the way we work and the results we consistently deliver for them.

Our client list speaks volumes for the quality of our lawyers and the experience they provide; from Mercedes-Benz, Octopus Ventures and Travelodge to property developers and some of the UK's largest banks, we work with a growing number of the FTSE 250 and some of the world's most exciting and ambitious growth businesses.

At Shoosmiths, innovation is in our DNA. That’s why the FT recognises us as one of Europe’s most innovative law firms.

The parties entered into a reinsurance contract that incorporated the arbitration clause in the Joint Excess Loss Committee, Excess Loss Clauses. Clause 15.5 provided that ...
United Kingdom Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The parties entered into a reinsurance contract that incorporated the arbitration clause in the Joint Excess Loss Committee, Excess Loss Clauses. Clause 15.5 provided that:

"Unless the parties otherwise agree the arbitration tribunal shall consist of persons with not less than ten years' experience of insurance or reinsurance."

One party appointed Alistair Schaff QC as one of the arbitrators. The other party applied for an order that he be removed.

At first instance Teare J granted the order. He held that although Alistair Schaff QC had considerably more than 10 years' experience in insurance and reinsurance law, he was not qualified as an arbitrator within the meaning of clause 15.5. The judge felt bound to follow the decision of Morison J in Company X v Company Y, 17 July 2000. In that case Morison J had held that the words meant that the parties required a "trade arbitration", ie that the tribunal was to consist of persons from the trade or business of insurance and reinsurance. A QC with considerable experience of insurance or reinsurance law did not fall within this group.

The party who had appointed Alistair Schaff QC appealed.

Held (Court of Appeal):

The appeal was allowed. Company X v Company Y was wrongly decided. There was no such thing as insurance or reinsurance "itself" which was distinct from the law of insurance and reinsurance. Unless the parties had some special reason to exclude lawyers, a barrister specialising in the field of insurance and reinsurance for more than 10 years would naturally be regarded as qualified for appointment as an arbitrator. If the intention were to restrict the parties' freedom of choice by excluding such a person, clear words would be needed.

(Since this dispute arose, the JELC Clauses have been amended so that arbitrators must be persons "with not less than 10 years' experience of insurance or reinsurance within the industry or as lawyers or other professional advisors serving the industry".)

(Allianz Insurance PLC v Tonicstar Ltd v Allianz Insurance PLC [2018] EWCA Civ 434)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More