ARTICLE
12 September 2025

The Role Of Expert Witnesses In Medical Malpractice Trials In Turkey

OP
Oran Partners Law Firm

Contributor

Oran Partners stands out as the only law firm in Turkey focused entirely on medical malpractice. Our team of committed trial lawyers specializes in representing international individuals affected by medical negligence and their families. We bring a wealth of insight from both the medical and legal fields, actively engaging in courtroom advocacy on a regular basis.

We take pride in our unique approach, blending deep legal expertise with a thorough understanding of medical details in each case. This focus ensures tailored and effective representation for our clients.

Our commitment is centered on achieving significant results for our clients, whether through settlements or verdicts. We focus on delivering effective legal solutions with skilled negotiation and strong courtroom representation.

In cases of medical malpractice Turkey, the presence of expert witnesses is often the decisive factor that influences the outcome of a trial.
Turkey Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In cases of medical malpractice Turkey, the presence of expert witnesses is often the decisive factor that influences the outcome of a trial. Because these lawsuits involve complex medical procedures and professional standards, expert testimony becomes crucial in helping the court understand what went wrong and whether it qualifies as malpractice. This article delves into how expert witnesses function in Turkish courts, why their evaluations are so powerful, and what both local and foreign patients should know about the process.

Why Expert Witnesses Are Indispensable in Malpractice Cases

Medical malpractice claims revolve around proving that a healthcare provider failed to meet the standard of care expected in their field. However, judges and lawyers are not trained physicians—they cannot independently determine whether a surgical error or misdiagnosis was due to negligence. Expert witnesses fill this gap by analyzing the medical details and explaining them in legal terms.

They assess whether the doctor followed established medical procedures, whether the harm was preventable, and whether the treatment fell below acceptable medical standards. Their input gives the court the technical knowledge required to render a fair and informed decision.

Who Qualifies as an Expert Witness in Turkey?

In Turkey, expert witnesses are typically chosen based on their medical qualifications, years of experience, and impartiality. Most are either practicing specialists, professors at medical universities, or certified professionals working with the Turkish Council of Forensic Medicine (Adli Tıp Kurumu). The court may assign a medical expert based on the nature of the case, ensuring that they are qualified to assess the specific issue—be it surgical error, anesthesia complications, or misdiagnosis.

To maintain objectivity, these experts must not have any personal or professional connections with either party in the lawsuit. Their neutrality is critical, as their evaluations are given considerable weight in court.

For more on selecting the right legal support, read our guide:
Choosing the Right Medical Malpractice Lawyer in Istanbul: What to Look For

The Process of Expert Evaluation

Once an expert is appointed by the court, they are provided access to all relevant patient documents. This includes medical records, surgical reports, test results, imaging scans, consent forms, and even communication between the patient and the healthcare provider. The expert carefully reviews these materials to determine if any deviation from standard medical care occurred.

They then submit a formal report that explains, in detailed and understandable language, whether the injury was avoidable and whether the harm was directly caused by the medical team's negligence. This report is sent to the judge and may be used as the basis for further questioning in court.

To learn how foreign patients can access and translate such documents, see:
How to File a Medical Malpractice Claim in Istanbul as a Foreigner

Weight of Expert Reports in Legal Proceedings

In Turkish malpractice lawsuits, expert reports often carry significant legal authority. Judges frequently base their rulings on the contents of these reports, especially in cases involving highly technical medical errors. If the report concludes that the physician acted appropriately, it becomes much harder for the plaintiff to win the case. On the other hand, a report identifying breaches in care can pave the way for a successful compensation claim.

That said, if a report is vague, biased, or insufficient, either party may request a secondary evaluation. The court can also refer the case to a more specialized panel, or in some instances, to a department within the Turkish Forensic Medicine Institute for a more comprehensive review.

The Challenges of Translation and Interpretation for Foreign Patients

One of the most overlooked challenges for international patients is the language barrier. Expert reports in Turkey are typically written in Turkish and filled with technical jargon. Without accurate translation, foreign plaintiffs may misunderstand the report's implications or miss crucial legal steps.

This makes it vital to have a legal team experienced in medical malpractice Turkey cases, especially one that regularly handles international claims. They can help translate, interpret, and if needed, challenge the findings through formal objections or counter-reports.

To understand more about translation and documentation issues, read:
Language Barriers in Medical Malpractice Claims in Turkey

Can Expert Opinions Be Challenged?

Yes, Turkish law allows both plaintiffs and defendants to challenge expert witness testimony. This can happen when the report lacks clarity, appears one-sided, or when there's a conflict of interest. The parties may request a new expert appointment, submit their own expert report, or appeal to a higher court.

Plaintiffs often hire independent medical experts to provide a second opinion. These counter-reports are reviewed by the judge alongside the court-appointed expert's report, especially if the two contain conflicting conclusions.

What Happens When Experts Disagree?

Disagreements between court-appointed experts and those hired independently are not uncommon. In such cases, the judge may schedule a hearing where both sides present arguments, or even order a third-party evaluation by a neutral panel.

The court's goal is to ensure that the final verdict is based on the most accurate, fair, and objective assessment possible. While this process can prolong the trial, it increases the likelihood of justice for the patient.

Conclusion: Expert Witnesses Are Central to Justice in Medical Malpractice Turkey

When pursuing a medical malpractice claim in Turkey, understanding the role of expert witnesses is essential. Their evaluations can determine whether a case proceeds, stalls, or succeeds. For both Turkish and international patients, the choice of legal representation is just as important as the evidence provided. A skilled lawyer will know how to present medical documents, challenge flawed expert opinions, and ensure your voice is heard in court.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More