ARTICLE
6 October 2026

WH Partners Submits Feedback to MFSA Consultation on Aircraft Financial Leasing Rules

WP
WH Partners

Contributor

We are a law firm with a strong focus on assisting businesses fuelling the digital economy and not only in the territories we operate in. We have offices in Malta, Italy, Romania, and we operate Czech, Polish and UAE desks, as well as having a worldwide network of correspondent firms. We have a well-established practice advising clients on (in no particular order) fintech, gaming & gambling, corporate, M&A, tax, dispute resolution, corporate finance, intellectual property, data privacy and personal data processing, consumer protection & advertising, real estate, employment & immigration matters, sports, technology & media, competition & state aid. Our firm and several of our lawyers are highly ranked by Chambers & Partners, Legal 500, IFLR1000 and Who’s Who Legal.
WH Partners has submitted formal feedback to the Malta Financial Services Authority on its consultation document proposing new Rules for Notified Aircraft Financial Leasing Companies and Related Due Diligence Service Providers. The submission addresses key areas including eligibility thresholds, scope and interaction with other licences, AML obligations, and removal from the list and restructurings.
Malta Finance and Banking

WH Partners has taken the opportunity to submit formal feedback to the Malta Financial Services Authority (“MFSA“) on its consultation document (Ref. 04-2026, dated 24 July 2026) proposing new Rules for Notified Aircraft Financial Leasing Companies and Related Due Diligence Service Providers (“DraftRulebook”).

This development represents a crucial milestone and a positive step towards enhancing Malta’s competitiveness vis-à-vis established aviation finance centres, such as Ireland.

Eligibility Threshold

WH Partners sought to ensure that the framework reflects the manner in which aircraft finance transactions are typically structured and completed. In particular, we requested clarification from the MFSA on whether the €100 million eligibility threshold is to be assessed on a gross asset basis rather than on the basis of net financing, given the highly leveraged nature of aircraft acquisitions.

We also suggested introducing a degree of flexibility at the notification stage, particularly in circumstances where the eligibility threshold cannot yet be demonstrated because the underlying acquisition of the relevant asset has not been formally completed. Our proposal was intended to reflect the commercial sequencing of aircraft finance transactions and to encourage high-value business, without undermining the regulatory objective behind the threshold requirement.

The submission also addressed the treatment of financing and security arrangements. Aircraft finance structures frequently involve third-party lenders and security over shares and assets. We submitted that clear guidance on the treatment of such arrangements, and on how they interact with the “wholly owned and controlled” requirement applicable to cells and subsidiaries under the proposed framework, would provide greater certainty to prospective applicants, investors and finance providers.

Scope and Interaction With Other Licences

We sought clarification on how the restriction concerning entities already holding another authorisation granted by the MFSA would apply in the context of larger corporate groups. In particular, we asked whether the restriction would apply solely to the notifying entity itself, or whether separate MFSA authorisations held by other entities within the same group would also affect its eligibility.

AML Obligations

The feedback also addressed the proportionality of governance, compliance and due diligence arrangements across structures involving multiple cells or special purpose vehicles. Building on the flexibility afforded under the Draft Rulebook for the appointment of the MLRO at either cell or parent company level, we sought clarity on whether a similar approach would apply to the appointment of the DDSP.

Removal from the List and Restructurings

Another area considered was the process applicable when a listed company ceases to meet the eligibility requirements under the Draft Rulebook. We suggested allowing some leeway to accommodate legitimate restructurings, while maintaining regulatory oversight and keeping the MFSA informed. This helps avoid a potentially complex and lengthy removal and a re-notification process, particularly where the transaction involves transferring or unwinding aircraft security arrangements, such as IDERAs.

Looking Ahead

Our feedback reflects the broader aim of contributing legal, commercial and operational insights to the development of the proposed framework. Open dialogue and due consideration of stakeholder feedback are instrumental in developing a framework that is both robust and commercially workable. We look forward to the outcome of the MFSA’s consultation, and WH Partners remains committed to supporting the continued development of Malta’s aviation finance framework.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More