ARTICLE
4 July 2025

The Hong Kong Stablecoins Bill And Its Impact On The Crypto Landscape

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
Stablecoins, digital currencies pegged to other conventional assets like fiat money or commodities, have become widely used in areas ranging from cross-border payments and remittances to decentralized finance.
Hong Kong Finance and Banking

Stablecoins, digital currencies pegged to other conventional assets like fiat money or commodities, have become widely used in areas ranging from cross-border payments and remittances to decentralized finance. They are often perceived as the bridge between traditional finance and cryptocurrencies, offering faster, cheaper transactions while reducing price volatility and associated risks.

However, stablecoins still face challenges such as inadequate asset backing and insufficient transparency, and potential systemic risks persist. These challenges were highlighted by the collapse of TerraUSD in 2022, which revealed vulnerabilities and led to calls for regulatory oversight.

Against this context, on 6 December 2024, Hong Kong gazetted its Stablecoins Bill ("Bill"), following from a Discussion Paper and a Consultation Paper issued by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority ("HKMA") on 12 January 2022 and 27 December 2023 respectively. The Bill marks a significant step in Hong Kong's proactive regulation of stablecoins.

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE STABLECOINS BILL

The Stablecoins Bill establishes a comprehensive framework seeking to regulate the issuance of stablecoins, and the conduct of stablecoin-related activities, in Hong Kong.

As a starting point, the Bill's scope is determined with reference to the following definitions:-

"stablecoin", defined as "a cryptographically secured digital representation of value that –

(a) is expressed as a unit of account or store of economic value;

(b) is used, or intended to be used, as a medium of exchange accepted by the public for any one or more of the following purposes – (i) payment for goods or services; (ii) discharge of a debt; (iii) investment;

(c) can be transferred, stored or traded electronically;

(d) is operated on a distributed ledger or similar information repository; and

(e) purports to maintain a stable value with reference to – (i) a single asset; or (ii) a pool or basket of assets",

but which excludes a digital representation of value that is issued by a central bank (or an entity performing the functions of, or authorised by, a central bank) or a government (or an entity authorised by a government to issue currency) or otherwise falls within the scope of other regulation.1

-"specified stablecoin", defined as: (a) a stablecoin that purports to maintain a stable value with reference wholly to one or more official currencies (and/or units of accounts or stores of economic value specified by HKMA); or (b) a digital representation of value (or value of a class) specified by the HKMA.

- "regulated stablecoin activity", where a person is deemed to carry on a regulated stablecoin activity if: (a) he issues a specified stablecoin in Hong Kong in the course of business; (b) he issues a specified stablecoin in the course of business which purports to maintain a stable with reference (whether wholly or partly) to Hong Kong dollars; or (c) he carries on an activity specified by HKMA by notice published in the Gazette.

These terms, previously undefined under Hong Kong law, are foundational to the Bill. They dictate the specific digital assets and activities that are subject to the new regime – clarifying the scope of the Bill and establishing boundaries for regulatory oversight. This in turn enhances certainty for market participants and industry stakeholders from the perspectives of compliance and enforcement.

Businesses engaged in regulated stablecoin activity are subject to regulation under the Bill and should be familiar with its key features:

- Licensing and Registration Requirements: The Bill establishes a licensing regime under which a license must be obtained from the HKMA to carry on regulated stablecoin activity (or advertise oneself as carrying on regulated stablecoin activity). Once licensed, the licensee will be listed on a register maintained by the HKMA and subject to duties as stipulated under the Bill.2 Most pertinently, the Bill sets out the minimum criteria that a licensee must fulfil:

- Corporate status: The licensee must be a company or an authorised institution incorporated outside Hong Kong.

- Financial resources: The licensee is obliged to have "adequate financial resources and liquid assets to meet its obligations ... as they will or may fall due". Further, the licensee must have paid-up share capital of not less than HKD 25M (or equivalent in other currency) or other financial resources as approved by the HKMA equivalent to or exceeding HKD 25M (or equivalent in other currency).

- Reserve assets management: The licensee must maintain a pool of reserve assets, separate from any other pool of assets or funds held by the licensee, which "must be of high quality and high liquidity with minimal investment risks", must be "adequately protected against claims by other creditors", and the market value of which must at all times be at least equal to the par value of the outstanding specified stablecoins of the type in circulation.

- Redemption: The licensee must provide the stablecoin holders with redemption rights that are not subject to any unduly burdensome conditions or unreasonable fees. Further, in the event of the licensee's insolvency, stablecoin holders have the right to direct the disposal of the specified reserve assets pool for the purposes of redemption on a pro rata basis and to claim against the licensee for any shortfall if proceeds from disposal of the specified reserve assets pool are insufficient to cover redemption in full.

- Risk management and systems of control: The licensee must implement adequate and appropriate risk management policies and/or systems of control in relation to matters including the management of reserve assets, appointment of key personnel and officers, preventing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing, the conduct of stablecoin activities, conflicts of interest, complaints handling and redress mechanisms, and business continuity and contingency planning.

- Disclosure and reporting obligations: The licensee is obliged to publish "a white paper to provide comprehensive and transparent information" about each type of specified stablecoin it issues and must make adequate and timely disclosures in relation to matters including the management of reserve assets and redemption rights. The licensee is also required to seek the HKMA's consent to appointment of key personnel and notify the HKMA of changes to such personnel.

- Prohibited Stablecoin Activities: The Bill outright criminalises certain harmful activities involving stablecoins. Broadly, these activities are: engaging in fraud and deception in relation to a specified stablecoin; and making a fraudulent misrepresentation or reckless misrepresentation for the purpose of inducing another person to enter into a transaction in respect of a specified stablecoin.

- Enforcement: The Bill grants broad enforcement powers to the HKMA as the primary regulatory authority. Aside from issuing, suspending, and revoking licenses, the Bill confers upon the HKMA the power to require the licensee to take remedial action, the power to appoint a statutory manager to manage the licensee's affairs, broad powers of investigation (including search and seizure under a warrant), and the power to impose sanctions for contravention of statutory provisions (including in relation to former licensees and officers of a licensee).

- Administration and Judicial Review: The Bill establishes the Stablecoin Review Tribunal ("Tribunal"), with jurisdiction to review decisions made under the purview of the Bill on application by aggrieved persons. Further, decisions made by the Tribunal may be appealed to the Hong Kong Court of Appeal.

IMPLICATIONS FOR HONG KONG AND THE BROADER CRYPTO INDUSTRY

As set out in the Consultation Paper, the key policy objectives sought to be achieved under the Bill are: to put in place appropriate safeguards to address potential monetary and financial stability risks posed by fiat referenced stablecoins; to provide adequate protection to such stablecoin users; to maintain Hong Kong's status as an international financial centre by putting in place an appropriate regulatory regime for FRS issuers that is in line with international regulatory recommendations; and to foster sustainable and responsible development of the virtual asset ecosystem in Hong Kong by providing legal and regulatory clarity.

To meet these key objectives, the Bill imposes strict licensing, asset backing, and consumer protection measures. While critics may argue that these features increase compliance costs and stifle innovation (especially for smaller or emerging stablecoin issuers), the Bill may still be viewed as a necessary step to safeguard digital finance. Clear regulatory standards have the potential to enhance investor and consumer confidence in stablecoins, encouraging greater market participation and innovation in digital payment systems and decentralised finance. Without such standards, long term market stability and consumer trust would be difficult to achieve in the rapidly evolving digital asset ecosystem.

For those interested in conducting stablecoin-related activities, the Bill provides transparency in the licensing process, establishing clear application and compliance procedures. The HKMA must provide written notice, including the grounds for its decisions, when granting, refusing, or attaching conditions to licenses or consents for key personnel. Further, any decision by the HKMA in this context may be subject to independent review by the Tribunal.

While the requirement for the HKMA's prior consent to the appointment of key personnel may introduce additional regulatory scrutiny and could be seen as a hurdle for some businesses, this requirement is balanced against the implementation of procedural safeguards and the availability of a review mechanism.

The Bill is one of the most advanced legislative efforts in the Asia-Pacific region in the cryptocurrency space. Jurisdictions such as Singapore and Australia have thus far relied on soft law instruments, combined with existing legislation, to mitigate risks.3 Hong Kong's initiative may serve as a benchmark for regional regulatory standards and inform compliance strategies for businesses moving forward.

The Bill was presented to the Hong Kong Legislative Council for First Reading and commencement of the Second Reading debate on 18 December 2024. It was passed by the Legislative Council on 21 May 2025 and will come into force on 1 August 2025.

Footnotes

1 Namely: the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (which applies to limited purpose digital tokens); the Securities and Futures Ordinance (which applies to securities or futures contracts); the Payment Systems and Stored Value Facilities Ordinance (which applies to floats or SVF deposits); and the Banking Ordinance (which applies to deposits).

2 For example: the duty to pay the license fee; the duty to display its license number on its advertising material and consumer-facing interfaces of its software; the duty to ensure that it fulfils the minimum criteria established; and the duty to report to the HKMA matters including an inability to meet its obligations, a change of address, and material changes of circumstances

3 Singapore, see e.g.: the Response to Public Consultation on Proposed Regulatory Approach for Stablecoin-related Activities (proposing that single-currency stablecoins be regulated under a new framework while other stablecoins remain subject to the existing regulatory regime under the Payment Services Act 2019); Australia, see e.g. Consultation Paper 381 (proposing that the existing information sheet on the applicability of the Corporations Act 2001 and Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 to crypto-assets be updated to include further guidance relating to stablecoins.

Originally published by Global Blockchain Business Council.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2025. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More