ARTICLE
27 October 2010

Extended Data Exclusivity Period for Pharmaceuticals

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

The data exclusivity period applicable to pharmaceuticals for human use is to be extended by the introduction of an 8+2+1 rule to replace the current 6-year exclusivity period.
Poland Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

The data exclusivity period applicable to pharmaceuticals for human use is to be extended by the introduction of an 8+2+1 rule to replace the current 6-year exclusivity period.

The changes are required under EU law and are being introduced as part of the health pack currently being prioritized by the Polish Parliament.

This means that:

  • For eight years from the date a product first receives marketing authorisation in an EU member state, applicants to register a generic drug may not refer to the information of the original marketing authorisation holder relating to (pre-) clinical testing
  • For those eight years plus a further two years, a generic product may not be marketed, even if it has been authorised
  • There is additional protection for a further year after that if in the meantime a new indication is registered.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 25/10/2010.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More