ARTICLE
22 October 2026

LD Munich, October 12, 2026, Review Of Case Management Orders, UPC_CFI_245/2025, UPC_CFI_618/2025

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
Mandatory fee payment under R. 333.3 is a condition precedent for lodging an application for panel review under R. 333.2 RoP (mn. 22)
Germany Intellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Mandatory fee payment under R. 333.3 is a condition precedent for lodging an application for panel review under R. 333.2 RoP (mn. 22)

An application under R. 333 RoP is an autonomous preliminary remedy against case management orders. Under R. 333.3 RoP in conjunction with R. 15.2 RoP, an application is legally deemed not to have taken place until the fee is paid. Simply uploading a brief within the 15-day period under R. 333.2 RoP without fee payment does not satisfy the deadline.

It would therefore have been necessary to file an application for re-establishment of rights pursuant to Rule 320 RoP. 

Representative fault precludes procedural relief under R. 320 and R. 9.3(a) RoP (mn. 23, 24)

The fee was paid late because the UPC representative had failed to ensure in time that a proof of transfer could be uploaded together with the filing.

Rules of Procedure explicitly attach serious legal consequences to the failure to pay a fee in time, this legislative policy decision must in principle be respected and enforced.

Cited case law not applicable: This represents a different starting point from that underlying the (i) decision of the CoA where the signed “correct” submission had inadvertently been replaced by an “incorrect” submission relating to different proceedings when uploading and (ii) the decision of the LD Düsseldorf where the counterclaim for revocation was uploaded under the old CMS not in the workflow designated for that purpose, but in a different workflow.

2. Division

Local Division Munich

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_245/2025

UPC_CFI_618/2025

4. Type of proceedings

Review of case management orders

5. Parties

Claimant: SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H., Shenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd

Defendant: Yunex GmbH

Intervener: Shenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd

6. Patent

EP 2 643 717

7. Body of legislation / Rules

R. 15.2, 333 RoP

Click here to view the full report.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More