ARTICLE
27 January 2014

CJ: One Can Sue Before Any EU Court For Online Infringement

DB
De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V.

Contributor

De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek is a leading international law firm, trusted by clients for over 150 years due to its deep engagement with their businesses and a clear understanding of their ambitions. While rooted in Dutch society, the firm offers global coverage through its network of top-tier law firms, ensuring seamless, tailored legal solutions. De Brauw’s independence enables it to choose the best partners while remaining a trusted, strategic advisor to clients worldwide.

The firm emphasizes long-term investment in both its client relationships and its people. De Brauw’s legal training institutes, De Brauwerij and The Brewery, cultivate diverse talent, preparing the next generation of top-tier lawyers through rigorous training and personal development. Senior leadership traditionally rises from within, maintaining the firm’s high standards and collaborative culture.

The CJ ruled that the relevant criterion for establishing jurisdiction in online copyright infringement cases is whether copies of the infringed works areaccessible online in the member state of the court addressed.
European Union Intellectual Property

The CJ ruled that the relevant criterion for establishing jurisdiction in online copyright infringement cases is whether copies of the infringed works areaccessible online in the member state of the court addressed. This is a considerably lower threshold than the criterion that the website activity be directed at that member state, as established in earlier case law.

In Pinckney v Mediatech a copyright infringing CD was made by a company in Austria and sold by several companies in the UK on a website which was also accessible in France. The French copyright owner sued the Austrian company in France. Questions regarding the jurisdiction of the French court ended up in Luxembourg before the Court of Justice ("CJ"). The CJ ruled that in the case of a copyright infringement committed on or via a website, the court will be able to hear the action if the website is accessible in that court's jurisdiction. This is an approach that deviates from earlier case law. According to prior rulings, the claimant had to prove that the website was specifically targeted at consumers in the member state where protection was being requested. The sole limitation is that the national court of the country of access can only award damages suffered in that jurisdiction.

This ruling will make it easier for national courts of the member states to establish jurisdiction when a copyright infringement takes place on or via a generally accessible website. Copyright owners as a consequence will be able to sue the entities in the courts of any member state from where the infringing contents are accessible. This should be especially useful in proceedings where provisional (injunction) measures are requested or in main proceedings when the infringer is based outside the EEX since in those cases it might be possible to obtain a cross-border measure. This is likely to apply to online infringement of other IP rights as well.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More