15 April 2024

Distinguishing Independent Contractors From Employees In Egypt

Andersen in Egypt


Andersen in Egypt is offering comprehensive and varied legal and tax services to companies and individuals, in addition to financial advisory services licensed by the Egyptian Financial Regulatory Authority (License No. 47), through our team of 9 partners and more than 70 of the top lawyers and consultants.
In the landscape of Egyptian employment law, the distinction between employees and independent contractors is both pivotal and nuanced.
Egypt Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on

In the landscape of Egyptian employment law, the distinction between employees and independent contractors is both pivotal and nuanced. This delineation is critical for understanding the legal protections and obligations afforded to workers, and it serves as the foundation for ensuring fair labor practices within the country. Egypt's legal framework, particularly Civil Law and Labor Law No. 12 of 2003, meticulously outlines the characteristics of employment and contractual relationships to safeguard workers' rights and establish a legal environment based on justice and equality.

The essence of this legal structure is to prevent employers from circumventing laws designed to protect employees. Some companies attempt to classify their workers as independent contractors rather than official employees. This classification can significantly impact workers' rights, depriving them of legally guaranteed privileges and allowing companies to evade certain responsibilities. The following sections explore the critical differences between employment contracts and contractor agreements, the implications of these distinctions, and the responsibilities companies bear towards their workers under Egyptian law.

Employment Contracts vs. Contractor Agreements

The Egyptian legal system provides clear definitions to distinguish between an employment contract and a contractor agreement, a distinction that has significant implications for worker rights and employer responsibilities.

  • Employment Contract: Central to the concept of an employment relationship is the element of control and subordination. An employment contract binds one party to work under the direction and supervision of another, in exchange for a predetermined wage. This relationship is characterized by the employer's authority to dictate work hours, assign tasks, and evaluate performance, establishing a dependency that is indicative of an employment relationship.
  • Contractor Agreement: Contrarily, a contractor agreement signifies a more autonomous working arrangement. Under such an agreement, an individual or entity agrees to complete a specific task or project for a fee, without being subject to the client's direct supervision or control. The contractor operates independently, free from the day-to-day oversight that characterizes an employment relationship. The absence of subordination and the focus on delivering specified outcomes rather than adhering to a fixed work schedule differentiate a contractor from an employee.

Subsidiary Relationship and Company's Responsibility

The subsidiary relationship emerges from the principle of authority and supervision inherent in employment relationships. This concept is critical in assessing the nature of the working arrangement and determining the corresponding legal obligations. For example, drivers or workers who are integrated into a company's operations, adhere to its regulations, and receive direct supervision and training, are typically considered employees rather than contractors. This classification has profound implications for both parties, especially regarding legal liability, worker protections, and the company's responsibility towards its workers.

In judicial instances, such as those seen in Uber BV vs. Aslam [2021] UKSC 5, the delineation between an employee and a contractor has been clarified through several determining factors. These include the company's role in setting pay rates, dictating terms and conditions, enforcing work acceptance, and monitoring performance. Such control over the work environment and conditions strongly suggests an employment relationship, thus placing specific legal and ethical responsibilities on the company towards those workers.

Liability for Workers' Mistakes

One of the most significant legal implications of the employee versus contractor distinction in Egypt involves liability for workers' actions. Under the principle of "Subsidiary Liability," a company is held legally accountable for any damages or injuries caused by its employees during the performance of their duties. This legal stance is grounded in the idea that an employer, by virtue of its supervisory and directive authority, acts as a guarantor for its employees' actions within the scope of their employment.

Subsidiary Liability

This concept of subsidiary liability establishes a direct route for injured parties to seek compensation from the employer, bypassing the need to involve the employee directly in legal actions. It's predicated on the understanding that employers should bear the responsibility for the actions of their employees, given the control and influence they wield over their work activities. However, it also provides a mechanism for employers to recoup any compensations paid, should they choose to pursue recovery from the employee responsible for the damage.

The Importance of Employer Diligence

The principles underlying subsidiary liability underscore the importance of careful employee selection, thorough training, and continuous supervision. From the initial hiring process to ongoing performance management, employers are expected to take all necessary precautions to ensure their employees are well-equipped to perform their duties safely and competently. This approach not only minimizes the risk of legal liability but also contributes to a safer and more productive work environment.


The delineation between employees and independent contractors in Egyptian law is more than a mere technical distinction. It carries profound implications for workers' rights, employer responsibilities, and the broader legal landscape of labor relations. As Egyptian law continues to evolve in response to changing work environments and emerging business models, the principles of justice, equality, and responsibility remain central. For companies operating within this jurisdiction, understanding and adhering to these legal distinctions is not only a matter of compliance but a reflection of their commitment to fair and ethical labor practices.

By recognizing the vital role that labor laws play in protecting workers and promoting a just workplace, employers can navigate the complexities of employment relationships with greater confidence and integrity. As the legal framework around employment and contracting continues to adapt, the fundamental commitment to safeguarding worker rights and ensuring equitable treatment for all remains a cornerstone of Egyptian labor law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More