ARTICLE
11 December 2025

UNDRIP In Action: British Columbia Court Of Appeal Issues Decision In Gitxaała v. British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner)

F
Fasken

Contributor

Fasken is a leading international law firm with more than 700 lawyers and 10 offices on four continents. Clients rely on us for practical, innovative and cost-effective legal services. We solve the most complex business and litigation challenges, providing exceptional value and putting clients at the centre of all we do. For additional information, please visit the Firm’s website at fasken.com.
On December 5, 2025, the BC Court of Appeal released its reasons for judgment in Gitxaała v. British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner), 2025 BCCA 430.
Canada British Columbia Government, Public Sector
Fasken are most popular:
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services, Healthcare and Transport industries

On December 5, 2025, the BC Court of Appeal released its reasons for judgment in Gitxaała v. British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner), 2025 BCCA 430. In a split decision, the majority allowed the appeals of Gitxaała Nation and Ehattesaht First Nation and issued a declaration that the Mineral Claims Regime, which is in the process of legislative reform, is inconsistent with article 32(2) of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).

Background

The appeals arose after the chambers judge decided not to issue declarations regarding UNDRIP in Gitxaała v. British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner), 2023 BCSC 1680. In that decision, the chambers judge found a duty to consult and granted the Province a period of 18 months to modernize the mineral tenure system to include consultation with Indigenous Nations. For more information on the chambers judge's decision, please refer to our bulletin on that case: Consultation and Mineral Claim Staking: The Gitxaała Case.

After the judgment, the provincial government issued orders related to mining activities in Gitxaała and Ehattesaht territory. These orders significantly narrowed the issues on appeal.

Implications

The decision in Gitxaała v. British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner), 2025 BCCA 430 clarifies judicial interpretation of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Although this legislation is BC-specific, there is analogous federal legislation, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. The broader implications of this decision remain to be determined.

Our own Kevin O'Callaghan and Samuel Geisterfer represented an intervenor, the Association for Mineral Exploration – BC, in the appeal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More