ARTICLE
29 June 2020

Proposed Class Action Alleges Generic Manufacturers Conspired To Price-fix And Allocate Generic Market

SB
Smart & Biggar

Contributor

Smart & Biggar uncovers and maximizes intellectual property and technology assets for our clients. Today’s fast-paced innovation economy demands a higher level of expertise and attention to detail when it comes to IP strategy and protection. With over 125 lawyers, patent agents and trademark agents collaborating across five Canadian offices, Smart & Biggar is trusted by the world’s leading innovators to find value in their IP rights. As market leaders in IP, Smart & Biggar’s team is on the pulse when it comes to the latest developments and the wider industry changes that impact our clients. To stay informed, visit smartbiggar.ca/insights, including access to our RxIP Update (smartbiggar.ca/insights/rx-ip-updates), a monthly digest of the latest decisions and law surrounding the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries.
On June 3, 2020, a proposed class action was commenced against over 50 generic drug manufacturers.
Canada Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

On June 3, 2020, a proposed class action was commenced against over 50 generic drug manufacturers (see Statement of Claim here). The claim alleges that the generic drug manufacturers violated the Competition Act by conspiring to allocate the market, fix prices and maintain the supply of generic drugs from 2012 to present, and claims damages or compensation of $2.75 billion. The action is brought on behalf of class members who purchased generic drugs in the private sector, either through private drug plans or paying cash. The claim alleges that the defendants conspired to allocate the market for generic drugs by agreeing whether to sell certain drugs, and by fixing the market shares and prices of drugs. The claim references an ongoing investigation in the United States into price fixing, bid rigging and market allocation in the generic pharmaceutical industry, in which certain manufacturers have entered guilty pleas (see press release here in respect of Apotex Corp.).

Originally published 26 June, 2020

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More