Luxembourg: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Unified Patent Court's Court of Appeal examines multiple appeals stemming from infringement and revocation proceedings between Fujifilm Corporation and Kodak entities concerning European Patent EP 3 476 616. The case involves complex jurisdictional questions under the UPC Agreement and raises fundamental issues about patent validity and enforcement across Germany and the United Kingdom.

The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court addresses a procedural question regarding conditional appeals in patent revocation counterclaims. This case examines when fee obligations are triggered for counterclaimants who lodge conditional appeals tied to the infringement claimant's appeal, and how the Rules of Procedure govern such conditional filings in UPC proceedings.

On March 19, 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its judgment in Brillen Rottler (C-526/24), addressing two issues that frequently arise in practice...

The Court of Appeal examines a request for discretionary review in a patent dispute between Adobe Inc., Adobe Systems Software Ireland Limited, and KEEEX SAS concerning European Patent EP 2 949 070. This procedural matter involves multiple rules of procedure including provisions on discretionary review, case management, and appellate processes within the Unified Patent Court framework.

The Unified Patent Court's Court of Appeal examines multiple appeals stemming from infringement and revocation proceedings between Fujifilm Corporation and Kodak entities concerning European Patent EP 3 476 616. The case involves complex jurisdictional questions under the UPC Agreement and raises fundamental issues about patent validity and enforcement across Germany and the United Kingdom.

The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court addresses a procedural question regarding conditional appeals in patent revocation counterclaims. This case examines when fee obligations are triggered for counterclaimants who lodge conditional appeals tied to the infringement claimant's appeal, and how the Rules of Procedure govern such conditional filings in UPC proceedings.

The Unified Patent Court's Court of Appeal examines multiple appeals stemming from infringement and revocation proceedings between Fujifilm Corporation and Kodak entities concerning European Patent EP 3 476 616. The case involves complex jurisdictional questions under the UPC Agreement and raises fundamental issues about patent validity and enforcement across Germany and the United Kingdom.

The Court of Appeal in Luxembourg addresses a critical application for suspensive effect in ongoing appeal proceedings between medical technology companies. This case involves patent EP 2 352 431 and raises important questions about procedural rights under the Unified Patent Court Agreement and the European Convention on Human Rights.

Article 33(1), third paragraph UPCA, establishes alternative, not exceptional, competence for the Central Division regarding defendants outside Contracting Member States.

On March 23, 2023, the Luxembourg Parliament approved a significant reform that modernises the Luxembourg arbitration law, with changes incorporated into the New Code of Civil Procedure.

Luther Lawfirm's legal professionals Aurélien Latouche and Valérie Flaus are featured on this page, which includes their professional profiles and contact information. The page also contains standard cookie policy information regarding the website's use of cookies for personalization, social media features, and analytics purposes.

On 1 July 2025, the Hague Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (the "Hague 2019 Convention") will enter into force in the United Kingdom.