ARTICLE
6 February 2026

Lost Will? Recent Case Highlights Estate Challenges

BB
Beresford Booth

Contributor

Beresford Booth is a full-service law firm in the Seattle area. Our clients include startups, high-growth companies, established businesses, families and individuals. We offer a full range of civil legal services in the areas of business, real estate, family law, adoption & assisted reproduction, estate planning & probate, litigation and employment law.
Joan Lanzner signed her Will in 2012. When she died in 2022, her original Will could not be located. The court admitted an authenticated copy of the Will to probate.
United States Family and Matrimonial
Beresford Booth are most popular:
  • within Insurance, Consumer Protection and Accounting and Audit topic(s)
  • in United States
  • with readers working within the Insurance and Property industries

Joan Lanzner signed her Will in 2012. When she died in 2022, her original Will could not be located. The court admitted an authenticated copy of the Will to probate. That Will left her estate to her biological son and two of her stepsons, Edward and Robert. It excluded her other stepson, Richard, and her biological daughter, Joni. Richard and Joni filed a challenge under Washington's Trust and Estate Dispute Resolution Act (TEDRA), RCW 11.96A. They argued that the missing original Will meant Joan had revoked it under the common law presumption of revocation. After a three-day trial, the court found clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that Joan did not intend to revoke the Will. The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision in January 2026 and ordered Richard and Joni to pay the other family members' legal fees.

Richard and Joni made a key mistake when they focused too heavily on a marked-up copy of the Will. In that copy, Joan had crossed out the beneficiaries' names and handwritten a donation to a charity. They presented this as proof of revocation. However, testimony and medical records showed Joan suffered from Alzheimer's disease starting around 2016. She developed a habit of writing on everything, including restaurant menus and knitting patterns. The trial court viewed the markings as equivocal and unreliable due to Joan's cognitive decline. Richard and Joni failed to offer strong evidence of a lasting change in Joan's intent. Meanwhile, the court credited evidence of Joan's cordial ongoing relationships with Edward and Robert, even as her health worsened. This helped overcome the presumption of revocation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More