ARTICLE
30 September 2026

WOTUS Revisited: EPA And Corps Propose To Refine “Relatively Permanent” And “Continuous Surface Connection”

N
Nossaman LLP

Contributor

For more than 80 years, Nossaman LLP has delivered the highest quality legal expertise and policy advice to our clients nationwide. We focus on distinct areas of law and policy, as well as in specific industries, ranging from transportation, healthcare and energy to real estate development, water and government.
California Water Views provides comprehensive coverage and analysis of water law, policy, and regulatory developments affecting California's complex water management landscape. The publication examines critical issues ranging from water rights and environmental compliance to infrastructure projects and drought management strategies.
United States California Energy and Natural Resources

On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released a supplemental proposal to revise the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act.

This follows a November 2025 proposal that drew more than 220,000 comments and reflects the Agencies’ continued effort to align WOTUS with the Supreme Court’s 2023 Sackett v. EPA decision.

The supplemental proposal focuses on three core concepts:

  • “Relatively permanent” waters – The Agencies propose to drop the “wet season” construct and instead tie jurisdiction largely to whether a feature is perennial, with limited exceptions for droughts and short dry spells.
  • “Perennial” – The proposal offers two options for defining this new term: (1) water present every day of the year under ordinary conditions, or (2) surface water flowing continuously year‑round. The Agencies seek input on which better reflects Sackett.
  • “Continuous surface connection” – For jurisdiction over wetlands, the new definition would require perennial surface water that is continuously connected to a jurisdictional water such that it is difficult to tell where one ends and the other begins, while allowing for brief interruptions from drought or routine dry periods.

The proposal also reaffirms several points from the Agencies’ 2025 proposal: interstate waters are not automatically jurisdictional simply because they cross state lines; certain ditches, prior converted cropland, and waste treatment systems remain excluded; and groundwater is not WOTUS.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More