ARTICLE
27 April 2026

Attorney Chris Edwards Featured In NCAJ Trial Briefs Q1 Issue

Wa
Ward and Smith, P.A.

Contributor

Ward and Smith, P.A. is the successor to a practice founded in 1895.  Our core values of client satisfaction, reliability, responsiveness, and teamwork are the standards that define who we are as a law firm.  We are an established legal network with offices located in Asheville, Greenville, New Bern, Raleigh, and Wilmington. 
Chris Edwards, a Board Certified Specialist in Appellate Practice at Ward and Smith, P.A., shares his expertise on effective legal writing in the Q1 issue of Trial Briefs. His column provides North Carolina trial attorneys with practical strategies for crafting clearer, more persuasive appellate briefs that resonate with judges. Edwards emphasizes the critical importance of context, brevity, and careful editing in making legal arguments accessible and compelling.(for PR)
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Ward and Smith, P.A. are most popular:
  • within International Law topic(s)

Chris Edwards, a North Carolina State Bar Board Certified Specialist in Appellate Practice and co-chair of the Appellate Practice at Ward and Smith, P.A., was recently featured in the Q1 issue of Trial Briefs, the quarterly publication of the North Carolina Advocates for Justice.

Chris writes the quarterly “Appellate Thinking” column, and his most recent submission, “Three Ways to Make Writing Clearer and More Persuasive,” gives North Carolina trial attorneys a direct framework for producing briefs that appellate judges can follow quickly and find persuasive.

Key takeaways include adding context to ensure judges and decision makers know what to look for and what’s important. Just as important as including context is omitting unnecessary information to help your reader better understand the facts. Finally, using tools that go beyond spellcheck — such as the read aloud function.

Chris stressed the importance of clear legal writing: “Writing clearly is not a stylistic preference. It is the job. A judge reading your brief at the end of a long day does not have the patience to work through a dense paragraph to find your argument. The brief has one job: make the argument easy to accept. Context, brevity, and careful editing get you there.”

Chris’s contribution reflects his depth of experience and commitment to helping fellow practitioners sharpen their approach to advocacy at every stage of a case. We’re always glad to see members of our team sharing their knowledge and contributing meaningfully to the broader legal community.

Read the full article here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More