- within Corporate/Commercial Law and Tax topic(s)
- with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
- in United States
- with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Business & Consumer Services and Healthcare industries
Christine Wong spoke to Wall Street Journal about the verdict of the Elizabeth Holmes fraud trial, where jurors' careful deliberations will make it harder to argue that errors or bias affected the outcome.
"The mixed verdict actually speaks to how careful the verdict really was," Christine said. "They really matched up the evidence against the specific claims."
According to Christine, finding one or two errors in a case related to evidence often isn't enough to win an appeal, because the higher court can decide there was enough evidence in favor of the conviction that the errors didn't matter.
Read the full article (subscription may be required).
Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved
