ARTICLE
16 September 2021

Epic v Apple: Apple Must Allow Other Forms Of In-App Purchase

PC
Preiskel & Co

Contributor

Preiskel & Co logo
Preiskel & Co LLP, is an English law firm independently recognised as a leader in the telecommunications, media and technology sectors. Preiskel & Co team of lawyers is truly international many of whom are qualified in multiple jurisdictions. This international mind-set has proved of considerable advantage to many clients, as the firm advises on matters in England but also coordinates advice across Europe, and other continents. The firm also advises on issues concerning outer space and the virtual world.
On 10 September 2021, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued an injunction in the Epic v Apple case. Apps cannot be restricted from directing users to other payment options, in addition to the ones offered by Apple.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On 10 September 2021, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued an injunction in the Epic v Apple case. Apps cannot be restricted from directing users to other payment options, in addition to the ones offered by Apple. The injunction will take effect on 9 December 2021. The injunction reads as follows:

"Apple Inc. and its officers, agents, servants, employees, and any person in active concert or participation with them ("Apple"), are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined from prohibiting developers from (i) including in their apps and their metadata buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms, in addition to In-App Purchasing and (ii) communicating with customers through points of contact obtained voluntarily from customers through account registration within the app."

The judgment did not render Apple's business model as broadly monopolistic under Californian law, however it did find that Apple was engaging in anti-competitive behaviour.

Epic was found in breach of its contract with Apple when it implemented an alternative payment system in the Fortnite app. Epic must now pay Apple 30% of all revenue collected through the alternative system since it was implemented, totalling at around $3.5 million.

The Epic v Apple judgment can be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More