ARTICLE
21 February 2024

Fifth Circuit Court Of Appeals Hears Oral Arguments In Industry Groups' Ongoing Petition To Vacate Private Fund Adviser Rules

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
On 5 February 2024, the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and industry groups...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 5 February 2024, the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and industry groups representing private investment fund sponsors, in the industry groups' ongoing petition to vacate the new private fund adviser rules (PFAR) adopted by the SEC on 23 August 2023.

Arguments from both sides largely centered on whether the SEC overstepped its authority in adopting the PFAR. While both sides agreed that private funds are excluded from the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act), the industry groups argued that the SEC improperly claimed as statutory authority certain provisions of 2010's Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), which updated the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, "as a backdoor way of bypassing [private funds'] exemption from the [1940 Act]." The SEC countered that the specific provision the SEC cites for its authority speaks of "investors," which reflects an intent by Congress to include private fund investors within the SEC's expanded authority under the Dodd-Frank Act.

As the judges' questions during oral arguments largely focused on asking the petitioners why the Court should vacate the entirety of the PFAR—rather than certain provisions—legal analysts believe the Court may be preparing to overturn at least some portion of the PFAR. The Court is now expected to issue a ruling.

If implemented as adopted, the most significant aspects of the PFAR will begin coming into effect for certain advisers this September. The firm's guide to PFAR compliance provides a helpful overview of the rules, including guidance and considerations for both private fund sponsors and investors, and can be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More