ARTICLE
12 February 2025

Eleventh Circuit Strikes Down One-to-One Consent Rule

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On February 6, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the FCC's one-to-one consent rule (previously discussed here).
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On February 6, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the FCC's one-to-one consent rule (previously discussed here). Applying the Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the FCC exceeded its legal authority by enforcing additional consent restrictions not explicitly outlined in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

The FCC had implemented the one-to-one consent rule as a safeguard against excessive telemarketing calls. By requiring consumers to grant consent to each specific seller, the rule sought to minimize unwanted marketing communications.

By invalidating the rule, the court effectively maintains the status quo, which allows businesses to rely on a single instance of consumer consent for multiple lead generators.

Putting It Into Practice: This ruling likely ends the FCC's push on the one-to-one consent rule. In the short term, it will need to decide whether it appeals the ruling to a possible hostile Supreme Court. A Trump-centric FCC may have a different view altogether. We will keep monitoring the space for future developments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More