ARTICLE
16 July 2018

Scientist Settles SEC Insider Trading Charges

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A former scientist at a California-based biotech company agreed to settle SEC insider trading charges.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

A former scientist at a California-based biotech company agreed to settle SEC insider trading charges.

According to an SEC Complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the Defendant was a scientist who worked on the development of a genetic sequencing platform. The SEC alleges that the Defendant made numerous profitable trades in advance of announcements touting (i) the achievement of certain scientific product milestones and (ii) the product launch. The SEC alleges that the Defendant's trading activity occurred during "blackout periods," in which his company prohibited employees from trading in its stock. The SEC also alleges that the Defendant shared material nonpublic information with a relative, with the intention that the relative benefit from trading on the information. The Defendant allegedly generated over $40,000 through trading on this non-public information.

The Defendant agreed to pay disgorgement of $40,662, prejudgment interest of $4,228, and a penalty of $43,342. He neither admitted nor denied the SEC allegations. The settlement is subject to Court approval.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More