ARTICLE
11 August 2023

Second Circuit Clarifies SEC Disgorgement Following NDAA Exchange Act Amendments

CG
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

Contributor

With a history of legal innovation dating back to the firm’s founding in 1919, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP is trusted by market-leading financial institutions, companies and their boards to manage significant litigation, regulatory matters and transactions. The firm is based in New York with offices in London and Washington, D.C.
The United States Supreme Court has, in recent years, decided two cases concerning the authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to seek disgorgement.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

The United States Supreme Court has, in recent years, decided two cases concerning the authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to seek disgorgement. In 2017, the Court held in Kokesh v. SEC that disgorgement is subject to the same five-year statute of limitations as other civil penalties under 28 U.S.C. § 2462. Three years later, the Court held in Liu v. SEC that the SEC may seek disgorgement even though it is not explicitly authorized by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and that, because disgorgement is an equitable remedy, disgorgement awards may not exceed a wrongdoer's net profits and generally must be paid to the wrongdoer's victims rather than to the U.S. Treasury. Our firm memoranda discussing these two cases can be found here and here.

CGR Memo - Second Circuit Clarifies SEC Disgorgement Following NDAA Exchange Act Amendments.pdf (pdf | 270.71 KB )

To subscribe to Cahill Publications Click Here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More