ARTICLE
4 October 2016

IPR And CBM Statistics For Final Written Decisions Issued In August 2016

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
In the 36 Final Written Decisions issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in August, the Board cancelled 468 of the instituted claims and declined to cancel 213 of the instituted claims.
United States Intellectual Property

In the 36 Final Written Decisions issued by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in August, the Board cancelled 468 (68.42%) of the instituted claims and declined to cancel 213 (31.14%) of the instituted claims. Patent owners conceded 3 (0.44%) of the instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer.

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 22 (61.11%) of the decisions, all instituted claims survived in 7 (19.44%) of the decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 7 (19.44%) of the decisions. A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Final Written Decision.

The overall cumulative instituted claim survival rate, broken down by technology center, is as follows:

The following resources are also available on the AIA Blog:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More