ARTICLE
10 August 2022

Judge Albright Grants Stay Pending Resolution Of Inter Partes Review In Sonrai Memory Ltd. v. Western Digital Techs., Inc.

WT
Winston Taylor

Contributor

Whether you're leading the way, disrupting an industry, entering a new phase of growth, or launching a defining product—we're in the room with you. In the action. Sleeves rolled up.

With a rich history spanning both sides of the Atlantic, we are present in the major commercial centers that matter to our clients: the U.S., the U.K., Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Combining scale with the speed clients demand, our defining capabilities include major litigation, critical transactions, strategic IP, and private wealth.

Our team of over 1,400 lawyers works hand-in-hand across markets, sectors, practice areas, and client teams. All-in problem solvers, we bring the creativity to think differently, and the pragmatism to get things done when it counts the most.

Embedded in your business and sharing your ambition, we take the work personally. Shaping what we do and how we do it around your goals and needs, always one step ahead of the moment.

On August 4, 2022, Judge Albright granted stay pending resolution of the inter partes review in the case of Sonrai Memory Limited v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc.
United States Intellectual Property

On August 4, 2022, Judge Albright granted stay pending resolution of the inter partes review in the case of Sonrai Memory Limited v. Western Digital Technologies, Inc. This action alleges that Western Digital Technologies, Inc. (Western Digital) infringed three patents belonging to Sonrai Memory Limited (Sonrai). Less than two months after Sonrai filed this action, Western Digital began petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for IPRs of the three patents.

In its analysis, the Court considered three factors. The Court found that the stage of the proceedings factor weighed against granting a stay because this action was at an advanced stage. The Court also found that the second factor–undue prejudice upon non-movant–weighed against granting a stay. However, the Court concluded that the simplification-of-issues factor overwhelmed the other two factors. In its analysis of this factor, the Court emphasized the PTAB decision, which concluded that Western Digital sufficiently demonstrated a reasonable likelihood of success of prevailing in its invalidity contentions. Therefore, after reiterating that the simplification-of-issues is the most important factor to consider, the Court granted a stay.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More