United States: Disclosure & Electronic Discovery & Privilege

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
Check Your Parachute: SDNY Finds Waiver After Inadvertent Production Of Privileged Documents
A federal court ruling examines what happens when a party inadvertently produces over 5,400 privileged documents to government investigators and attempts to claw them back. The decision hinges on whether reasonable steps were taken to prevent disclosure in the first place, with the court finding that flawed document review processes and inadequate quality control led to privilege waiver despite the inadvertent nature of the production.
United States Litigation
SJ
Steptoe LLP
Video
KEEP YOUR PROMSIES!: Court Sets In-Person Evidentiary Hearing To Examine TCPA Defendant’s CRM Records After Defense Counsel “Failed To Follow Through” (Video)
A federal judge in Florida has ordered TCPA defendant Czar Marketing Group to appear in court with their CRM system for live examination after defense counsel failed to produce promised discovery records. The court's unprecedented decision to conduct an in-person evidentiary hearing stems from suspicious similarities between production documents and concerns about altered records, raising questions about discovery compliance and potential spoliation.
United States Litigation
Troutman Amin LLP
Article
Court Declines To Give Generative AI Review Special Scrutiny, Treats It As TAR
A federal magistrate judge in California has ruled that the use of generative AI in document review is subject to the same reasonableness and proportionality standards as traditional Technology Assisted Review (TAR), establishing that courts will not impose special requirements on AI-powered review tools absent specific evidence of deficiency. The decision addresses key questions about pre-culling documents with search terms before AI review and the extent to which parties must disclose validation metrics f
United States Litigation
AP
Arnold & Porter
Article
Old Rules, New Tools: N.D. Cal. Applies Traditional TAR Principles To Generative AI Discovery
A recent Northern District of California decision provides crucial guidance on using generative AI tools in legal discovery, establishing that courts will treat AI-powered document review as a form of traditional Technology Assisted Review rather than a novel discovery category. The ruling addresses key questions about pre-filtering documents with search terms and the extent to which parties must disclose AI review metrics to opposing counsel.
United States Technology
W
WilmerHale
Article
Artificial Intelligence, Privilege, And Work Product: Emerging Risks In The Life Sciences Industry
Recent court decisions reveal conflicting approaches to whether communications with generative AI tools waive attorney-client privilege or work product protection, creating significant uncertainty for companies handling sensitive legal and proprietary information. Life sciences companies face heightened risks as they increasingly rely on AI tools while managing confidential clinical data, regulatory strategies, and intellectual property that may become subject to discovery in future litigation.
United States Commercial
AP
Arnold & Porter
Article
California Court Of Appeal Charts Middle Course On Meaning Of 'Great Bodily Injury,' Effectively Limiting Scope Of Disclosable Police Records
A California Court of Appeal has issued a first-of-its-kind decision interpreting what constitutes "great bodily injury" under the California Public Records Act's 2019 amendments, which mandate disclosure of police use-of-force records. The court rejected both the ACLU's broad interpretation that would have made virtually all police force records disclosable and the government's narrow interpretation limiting disclosure to life-threatening injuries, instead charting a middle course that effectively narrows
United States Litigation
LB
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Article
Good In Practice | Episode 27: Fighting For The Truth: The Wrongful Conviction Case Of Pierre Rushing (Podcast)
A wrongful conviction case spanning 15 years comes to light as Greenberg Traurig attorneys uncover new evidence suggesting Pierre Rushing, convicted of murder at age 22, may be innocent. With a recanted eyewitness testimony and hundreds of previously undisclosed police reports, the legal team fights to overturn a conviction built on questionable evidence.
United States Litigation
GT
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
See more