ARTICLE
24 September 2019

FTC Supports CFPB Proposal To Amend Debt Collection Practices

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

In comments supporting a CFPB proposal to amend the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act, the FTC recommended that the CFPB
United States Finance and Banking

In comments supporting a CFPB proposal to amend the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act, the FTC recommended that the CFPB require collectors to adopt procedures to ensure that consumers receive notices.

As previously covered, the CFPB proposal to amend its Regulation F would, among other things:

  • limit a debt collector's call attempts to seven times a week;
  • require a debt collector to wait one week after speaking with a consumer before calling again;
  • force debt collectors to send disclosures to consumers with debt information, such as itemizations of debt, and guidance on how consumers can respond to collection communication;
  • allow emails, text messages and other new communication technologies to be used in collection communications; and
  • prohibit a debt collector from suing or threatening to sue a consumer if the relevant statute of limitations for collection on the item has expired.

The FTC advised the CFPB to:

  • require collectors to adopt procedures that would ensure that consumers receive notices, and that collection notices are not sent to an unauthorized party;
  • assess whether unnecessary burdens would be placed on law enforcement agencies to prove that a debt collector knew that debt was time-barred; and
  • clarify collectors' obligations concerning voicemail messages.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More