ARTICLE
6 March 2026

Florida District Court Upholds CFPB's Residential PACE Rule

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On February 12, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida upheld the CFPB's final rule applying mortgage-style requirements to Residential Property Assessed Clean Energy...
United States Florida Finance and Banking
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On February 12, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida upheld the CFPB's final rule applying mortgage-style requirements to Residential Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing, rejecting a trade association's challenge under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Tenth Amendment.

The CFPB finalized its Pace Rule in December 2024 (previously discussed here) to implement Section 307 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which amended the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) to require the Bureau to apply the statute's ability-to-repay and related civil liability provisions to PACE financing. The rule amended Regulation Z to treat voluntary PACE assessments as "credit," thereby subjecting PACE transactions to TILA, certain provisions of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), and the SAFE Act.

In its decision, the court concluded that PACE financing constitutes "credit" under TILA because it arises from a voluntary contractual financing arrangement, even though repayment is collected through property tax assessments. The court further determined that Section 307 did not limit the Bureau to applying only the ability-to-repay provisions and that the CFPB acted within its broader TILA rulemaking authority in extending additional mortgage-related requirements to PACE transactions. The court also rejected arguments that the rule was arbitrary and capricious, finding that the Bureau reasonably relied on its 2023 PACE Report and sufficiently addressed criticisms of its methodology and data. The court dismissed the Tenth Amendment challenge, concluding that the rule regulates voluntary consumer credit transactions rather than state taxation and does not impermissibly commandeer state or local governments.

Putting It Into Practice: This decision removes a major litigation overhang for the CFPB's Residential PACE rule as the March 1, 2026 effective date approaches. Market participants should begin to update compliance programs as necessary.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More