ARTICLE
10 December 2024

CFPB's Settlement Imposes Permanent Ban On Defunct Student Loan Relief Company And Its Owner

SM
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton

Contributor

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton logo
Sheppard Mullin is a full service Global 100 firm with over 1,000 attorneys in 16 offices located in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since 1927, companies have turned to Sheppard Mullin to handle corporate and technology matters, high stakes litigation and complex financial transactions. In the US, the firm’s clients include more than half of the Fortune 100.
On December 3, the CFPB filed a proposed settlement to resolve a long running lawsuit against a student loan relief company and its owner (collectively, the "Defendants").
United States Finance and Banking

On December 3, the CFPB filed a proposed settlement to resolve a long running lawsuit against a student loan relief company and its owner (collectively, the "Defendants"). The settlement bars the company from offering or providing debt settlement products. In addition, the Defendants must pay $2,000 in civil monetary penalties, an amount determined based on their inability to pay more.

Under the 2021 lawsuit, the Bureau alleged that the Defendants, along with the company's manager and owner-in-fact, unlawfully collected nearly $3.5 million in advance fees from approximately 3,300 consumers for access to free federal debt-relief programs, in violation of the Federal Trade Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR). The Bureau's claims against the manager and owner-in-fact remain pending.

Under the TSR, sellers and telemarketers are prohibited from requesting or receiving advance fees for any debt-relief service until they renegotiate, settle, reduce, or otherwise alter the terms of at least one of a consumer's debts and the consumer has made at least one payment on such altered debt. According to the Bureau, Defendants' advance-fee violations cost approximately 3,300 consumers nearly $3.5 million in advance fees.

Putting It Into Practice: Questionable student loan debt relief practices have been a focal point for both federal and state regulators, with the TSR and the Impersonation Rule (effective since April 2024) serving as key enforcement tools (see discussions of previous federal and state enforcement actions here, here, and here). Noncompliance with these regulations can lead to severe consequences, including substantial fines and prohibitions on further related business activities.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More