ARTICLE
10 December 2024

CFPB's Settlement Imposes Permanent Ban On Defunct Student Loan Relief Company And Its Owner

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On December 3, the CFPB filed a proposed settlement to resolve a long running lawsuit against a student loan relief company and its owner (collectively, the "Defendants").
United States Finance and Banking
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Strategy and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

On December 3, the CFPB filed a proposed settlement to resolve a long running lawsuit against a student loan relief company and its owner (collectively, the "Defendants"). The settlement bars the company from offering or providing debt settlement products. In addition, the Defendants must pay $2,000 in civil monetary penalties, an amount determined based on their inability to pay more.

Under the 2021 lawsuit, the Bureau alleged that the Defendants, along with the company's manager and owner-in-fact, unlawfully collected nearly $3.5 million in advance fees from approximately 3,300 consumers for access to free federal debt-relief programs, in violation of the Federal Trade Commission's Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR). The Bureau's claims against the manager and owner-in-fact remain pending.

Under the TSR, sellers and telemarketers are prohibited from requesting or receiving advance fees for any debt-relief service until they renegotiate, settle, reduce, or otherwise alter the terms of at least one of a consumer's debts and the consumer has made at least one payment on such altered debt. According to the Bureau, Defendants' advance-fee violations cost approximately 3,300 consumers nearly $3.5 million in advance fees.

Putting It Into Practice: Questionable student loan debt relief practices have been a focal point for both federal and state regulators, with the TSR and the Impersonation Rule (effective since April 2024) serving as key enforcement tools (see discussions of previous federal and state enforcement actions here, here, and here). Noncompliance with these regulations can lead to severe consequences, including substantial fines and prohibitions on further related business activities.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More