ARTICLE
25 October 2021

Broker-Dealer Settles Charges For Signing Noncompliant Arbitration Settlement Agreement

HL
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Contributor

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes matters.

Operating at the intersection of business, finance, and government, we bring an unwavering commitment to client service and the decisive counsel that helps clients achieve exceptional results.

Consistently recognized for innovation across legal services, we combine sharp judgment with deep commercial perspective and intellectual rigor to address critical, cutting-edge challenges.

With 3,100 lawyers worldwide, we offer global scale with strong local insight in the markets that matter most. Our commitment extends beyond client work through pro bono activities, community investment, and responsible business practices.

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for violating FINRA Rule 2081 ("Prohibited Conditions Relating to Expungement of Customer Dispute").
United States Finance and Banking

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for violating FINRA Rule 2081 ("Prohibited Conditions Relating to Expungement of Customer Dispute").

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA found that the broker-dealer signed an arbitration settlement agreement with a customer providing that the customer would not oppose, or otherwise interfere with, a request to expunge the dispute information from the Central Registration Depository ("CRD") System. FINRA found that the broker-dealer "inadvertently" failed to remove the provision permitting expungement from the CRD of the complaint against the broker-dealer's registered representative before entering into the FINRA arbitration settlement agreement.

As a result of its findings, FINRA determined that the broker-dealer violated FINRA Rules 2081 and 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade").

To settle the charges, the broker-dealer agreed to (i) a censure and (ii) a $20,000 fine.

Commentary

FINRA Rule 2081 expressly prohibits a broker-dealer from entering into a settlement agreement of the type that is the subject of this enforcement action. The broker-dealer was charged with violating that rule and agreed to a disciplinary action for such violation.

What purpose does the additional charge under Rule 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade") serve? FINRA has developed the practice of adding on a Rule 2010 violation to almost every single enforcement action. The Rule should be retitled the "Prohibition against Violating Pretty Much Any Other FINRA Rule." Or, if that is all Rule 2010 means, it should just be repealed as it serves no independent purpose.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More