ARTICLE
16 April 2010

Department of Labor Ends Practice of Issuing Fact-Specific Opinion Letters

LH
Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren

Contributor

Larkin Hoffman provides counsel to a wide variety of organizations, from small businesses and nonprofits to Fortune 500 companies, in many areas of practice including corporate and governance matters, litigation, real estate, government relations, labor and employment, intellectual property, information technology, franchising and taxation. The firm also serves the needs of individuals in many areas including trusts and estates and family law.

We are an entrepreneurial law firm with a vibrant practice. Our attorneys’ doors are open for collaboration in a friendly and professional atmosphere. We nurture client relationships through exceptional service, teamwork and creativity even as we work remotely. We are a firm, not merely a collection of individuals practicing law under the same roof. This spirit of cooperation – among attorneys and staff – is a key element of our firm culture.

On March 24, 2010, the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division ("WHD") stated that it will not issue individualized opinion letters going forward.
United States Employment and HR

On March 24, 2010, the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division ("WHD") stated that it will not issue individualized opinion letters going forward. These opinion letters conduct a fact-specific analysis of the Family Medical Leave Act ("FMLA") and Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). The WHD indicated that it will now respond to requests for opinion letters by referring the applicant to the applicable statutes and/or regulations. The WHD also stated that it will issue "administrative interpretations" on issues relating to an entire industry or large class of employees. These "administrative interpretations" will be based on hypothetical fact patterns, rather than actual fact patterns submitted by employers.

This move is significant because employers regularly rely on opinion letters issued by the WHD, as they involve fact-specific interpretations of the law without the expense and hassle of litigation. Without these fact-specific analyses, employers will be required to guess, to a certain extent, how a court or the WHD would interpret an employer's actions. This move by the WHD indicates a lessened willingness to work with employers as they attempt to determine whether their employment practices are in compliance with applicable statutes and regulations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More