ARTICLE
18 February 2014

State Laws Governing Noncompete Agreements May Be A Trap For The Unwary

FH
Ford & Harrison LLP

Contributor

FordHarrison is a labor and employment firm with attorneys in 29 offices, including two affiliate firms. The firm has built a national legal practice as one of the nation's leading defense firms with an exclusive focus on labor law, employment law, litigation, business immigration, employee benefits and executive compensation.
As discussed previously, noncompete agreements can be a powerful tool to help employers protect their confidential, proprietary or trade secret information from disgruntled departing employees.
United States Employment and HR

As discussed previously, noncompete agreements can be a powerful tool to help employers protect their confidential, proprietary or trade secret information from disgruntled departing employees. However, the differing requirements imposed by state laws applicable to noncompetition agreements can cause unforeseen problems for employers seeking to enforce these agreements in multiple states. For example, some states permit courts to "blue pencil" or amend unenforceable portions of otherwise enforceable agreements, while other states prohibit such amendments. Additionally, in some states, such as California, covenants not to compete are illegal because they violate public policy by limiting open competition and employee mobility.

To assist employers in navigating the requirements of the various state laws, FordHarrison attorneys have prepared a 50-State Survey of Noncompete Laws highlighting the significant provisions of these laws.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More