ARTICLE
1 December 2025

Another NY Federal Judge Rules That the ADA Does Not Require Retailers To Provide QR Codes or Digital Tags on Merchandise

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 975 lawyers across 17 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
On November 18, 2025, Judge Vernon S. Broderick dismissed a complaint brought by a blind plaintiff who claimed that retailer...
United States Employment and HR
Seyfarth Shaw LLP are most popular:
  • within Consumer Protection, Compliance, Government and Public Sector topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Banking & Credit, Business & Consumer Services and Construction & Engineering industries

Seyfarth Synopsis: Does the ADA require retailers to add QR codes to product tags? The Southern District of New York says no.

On November 18, 2025, Judge Vernon S. Broderick dismissed a complaint brought by a blind plaintiff who claimed that retailer Lululemon violated Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by failing to provide QR codes or digital tags on merchandise. The plaintiff argued that QR codes would allow her to access product information using her smartphone.

The Court reiterated that the ADA does not require businesses to alter their inventory or products to accommodate customers with disabilities. The Court observed that digital tags/QR codes are part of the merchandise, and requiring them would be akin to requiring bookstores to carry Braille books—something courts and the Department of Justice have said the ADA does not mandate. The decision relied on a line of cases emphasizing that the ADA ensures equal access to goods and services, not changes to the goods themselves.

The court also rejected the plaintiff's claim that the retailer failed to provide her with auxiliary aids and services because she did not allege that she informed store employees of her disability or requested assistance.

This is the second decision in favor of retailers concerning digital tags and QR codes. Plaintiff's firm advanced these same claims in Bunting v. Gap, Inc., and lost before an EDNY judge last year.

The takeaway from these decisions is that while digital tags and/or QR codes may become an industry standard in the future, they are not required by the ADA. And most importantly, it is still legal and acceptable to provide prompt service to customers with sight disabilities who need assistance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More