- within Employment and HR topic(s)
- in United States
- with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services and Retail & Leisure industries
- within Energy and Natural Resources topic(s)
On April 9, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a brief order, staying the District Court's order reinstating former National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or "Board") Member Gwynne A. Wilcox. The Board is now left without a quorum for a third time, which, under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA" or the "Act"), requires at least three members. See New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 560 U.S. 674 (2010).
Chief Justice John Roberts entered the order without an accompanying opinion, staying Member Wilcox's reinstatement "pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court." As reported here, here, and here, the Supreme Court appears primed to hear the merits of President Trump's firing of Member Wilcox. Should the Supreme Court grant cert., it could determine the continuing viability of Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), as well as Wiener v. United States, 357 U.S. 349 (1958), which would have implications for the firing of all administrative agency heads.
We will continue to track the Wilcox litigation and its impact upon the NLRB.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
